|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
rotors excite me
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
I eliminated emissions for a few reasons:
1) More vacuum lines, solenoids, and other crap to break and therefore diagnose and fix. 2) It looks like shit. There's a reason it's called the rat's nest. 3) Weight. The lines and solenoids don't weigh much, but the ACV, air pump, and air pump intake probably make up ~15lbs. 4) It further familiarized me with the car, its systems and how they were originally made to work, and then how I can improve or improvise on that.
__________________
He isn't a killer. He just wins -- thoroughly. ![]() ![]() '87 TII 240+ rwhp on my DIY streetport, ~13psi on stock turbo, Racing Beat REVTII exhaust ![]() rTek 2.1 awaits a tune Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
IT'S ALIVE!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 811
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
^^^ I can see why someone would want to do that. This car, however, is going to be DD so the ACV, air pump, OMP, BAC, thermowax, 6PI and related components will be retained. If I can remove some/all emissions equipment and retain those then great, otherwise everything will be staying in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Pirate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central IL
Posts: 1,323
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
The car drives fine w/o them, you can keep the other components like the OMP, the BAC, and warm up pellet, and remove the rest like I already said. I dont understand how "being a daily driver" has anything to do with keeping that stuff, cause it BARELY affects drivability.... Quote:
Emissions removal also makes it a lot easier and less of a hassle to pull the top intake off if you need to have access to the injectors or wiring harness.
__________________
Rotaries:They are NOT that complicated! Last edited by Max777; 01-25-2010 at 04:53 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
IT'S ALIVE!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 811
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blue Blur
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Windsor
Posts: 211
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() I was just proving that instead of going through all the work of taking apart half my engine and buying 40-50 dollars in block of plates and caps, and lose bottom end by wiring open my ports, i spent 6 bucks and an hour of my time to get low/top end torque and still keep my engine intact. I plan for the future. Now my 10th ann im going to ditch it all. I plan to run that to the ground... Im also tired of all my friends ditching broken components of there cars, ghetto rigging the engine to run without them then using the "i took it off for weight reduction excuse" If i can have an average 150-200 pound friend ride with me and not notice to much performance loss, i dont see the need to ditch 30 pounds of crap, unless im gutting the interior too. And power steering, and ac, and heat, and my radio...... Its all or nothin man. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|