Go Back   Rotary Car Club > Tech Discussion > RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92)

RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

View Poll Results: Which ignition setup would you go for?
LSx Coils with bulkhead fittings through the firewall 0 0%
Coil on plug 0 0%
other (please explain) 4 100.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2010, 06:15 PM   #1
vex
RCC Loves Me Not You
 
vex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 20
vex will become famous soon enough
Okay, then I think I shall do the bulk head setup--in the mean time I'm waiting on TTT's results so I know where to put the money down on the coils.
vex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 06:20 PM   #2
TitaniumTT
Test Whore - Admin
 
TitaniumTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Right Behind you son
Posts: 4,581
Rep Power: 10
TitaniumTT will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicauto View Post
I think an inductive system certianly has its limits, and it may be outperformed at lower power levels by adding a huge array of boxes.........but simplicity/cleanliness/power I believe are quite balanced with inductive.

I'm as anxious as everyone to see the B2B results though.
Really? I would think that at the lower power levels the inductive would be the better way to go. To me the slow rotor speed is in need of a long slow burn - Inductive. It's when you start dousing the flame with water that you need the higher capacity/higher energy of the CDI.

water of course just meaning incredibly high combustion pressures and dense dense mixtures that require that type of energy to still jump the gap. Think of wet fouling the plugs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vex View Post
Okay, then I think I shall do the bulk head setup--in the mean time I'm waiting on TTT's results so I know where to put the money down on the coils.
I would definately skip the bulkhead idea. I don't like long leads or leads that pass through go near so much metal. I would seriously think about mounting them where the stock trailing's went, or on the block, or on the shock tower. That's just me though.
__________________
-The Angry Stig-
DGRR 2009, 2011, 2012 & 2013 - Best FC

DEALS GAP!! WOOHOOOO!!!!!

2015 Audi S4 - Samantha - Zero Brap S4
2004 RX8 - Jocelyn - 196rwhp, 19mpg fuel to noise converter
2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport - Wifey mobile - Now with 2.5" OME lift and 30" BFG AT KO's! So it begins
1998 Jeep Cherokee - 5 spd, 4" lift, 33" BFG's - Rotary Tow Vehicle
1988 'Vert - In progress
1988 FC Coupe - Gretchen -The attention whore BEAST!


I'm a sick individual, what's wrong with you?
I'm pure Evil
I'm still insane, in the best possible way.
I think Brian's idea of romance is using lube.
Your rage caused the meteor strike in Russia. The Antichrist would be proud of his minion.
You win with your thread. Most everything
It's a truck with a steel gate on the back. Just a statement of fact

Motec M820, AIM dash, ported 13B-RE Cosmo, 6-spd trans, 4.3 Torsen, custom twin wg fully divided mani, Custom 4" split into 2x 3" exhaust, Custom HMIC, Custom custom custom custom I like to welder stuff....
No Bolt-ons allowed. Dyno'ed @ Speed1 Tuned by me - 405rwhp on WG.... WM50 cuming soon.
-Angry Motherf*cker Mode ENGAGED-
TitaniumTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com