|
Tires,Wheels,Suspension,Brakes Info about Tires, Wheels, Suspensions, Brakes, etc. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#18 | |
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
The FC doesn't like going that low without running into major camber problems, especially in the rear. An (upright) rear camber adjust rod will only take out so much (negative) camber in the rear. Even with the adjustable links on the front of the rear subframe, you end up smacking the whole thing on compression. Pete_89T2's pic looks like it has a smidgen too much camber in the rear, or it's a weird illusion of the pic due to the compression of the suspension due to the turn... You'd get away with about 2 - 3 "fingers" of gap in the rear before there is really too much (negative) camber. Remember, rear camber hurts your straight-line acceleration due to inefficient contact patch of the rear tires (upon acceleration). It also causes uneven tire wear back there. Fronts are no problem due to almost any off-the-shelf front camber plates can dial it all out. It's still a bit problem in the rear on really drastic drops... -Ted |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|