|
Introduce yourself!! Tell me something about you and your history with rotary.. |
Welcome to Rotary Car Club. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-30-2014, 06:07 AM | #1 |
The Newbie
|
Hi from mass
Hello everyone my names Sean I'm from Massachusetts and I drive a 1993 fd3s with some mods. Looking to do an na renesis swap at some point next year. Possibly a 3 rotor . Look forward to some good post as well as info thanks..
|
11-30-2014, 11:53 AM | #2 |
Professional Stick Poker
|
Welcome. Personally I'd go with the 20B 3 rotor or stay RE/REW with a good build. Renesis would be a lot of work and money to be going backward power wise.
__________________
1979 SA22C (parts of one anyway) http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_foru...ad.php?t=15585 1975 MG Midget (building) http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_foru...ad.php?t=18681 1988 N/A SE model FC, dead stock and less than 85k on the clock. This one actually runs, so I don't fuck with it. Last edited by GySgtFrank; 11-30-2014 at 12:33 PM.. |
11-30-2014, 11:59 AM | #3 |
RCC Loves Me Not You
|
Welcome!
I agree with Gunny. At least price it out before you start. I've thought recently about having to move to Renesis engines when older 13B parts start drying up, but I'm not exactly excited about it. I don't know why they couldn't make more power, but it seems that's the case. I could be wrong about all this though haha. The Cosmo 3 rotors seem like they're coming down in price as of late. It would still be an expensive swap, but at least you wouldn't be reinventing the wheel and there is already some support out there. Just out of curiosity, what are your reasons for wanting to go Renesis 3 rotor? |
11-30-2014, 02:34 PM | #4 |
The Newbie
|
sorry I meant renesis or three rotor my mistake... my motor is getting tired 105psi front 100 rear and renesis are fairly cheap and I want na for reliability aspect plus I really like na and plan on doing a time attack car. na 20b would be awesome as well but so $$$$. I had a Honda time attack car that I never got to run . I just like trying to get as much out of a na as possible! I guess im weird but I like na the best and I like trying to see what I can get out of an na time wise and rev wise etc.. I dunno.. I know its expensive so when it comes down to it I will more than likely rebuild my motor...
|
11-30-2014, 03:05 PM | #5 | |
Professional Stick Poker
|
Quote:
For a heavier car like the FD a single turbo, low compression ratio engine (running moderate boost) is probably going to be the most reliable rotary you can build. At least one that makes the kind of power you will need for the FD. Just don't make the common mistake that most others do and start putting together all the sexy go fast stuff on the engine and not do a massive upgrade on the fuel system and ECU. Without those any boosted rotary is likely to implode, no matter how good the engine build was.
__________________
1979 SA22C (parts of one anyway) http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_foru...ad.php?t=15585 1975 MG Midget (building) http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_foru...ad.php?t=18681 1988 N/A SE model FC, dead stock and less than 85k on the clock. This one actually runs, so I don't fuck with it. |
|
11-30-2014, 03:22 PM | #6 | |
The Newbie
|
Quote:
__________________
Sean B. 1993 FD3S Touring |
|
11-30-2014, 04:41 PM | #7 | |
⊙⊙
|
Get in contact with RICERACING for the PFC
__________________
Quote:
|
|