Go Back   Rotary Car Club > Tech Discussion > RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92)

RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.


Welcome to Rotary Car Club.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2010, 01:24 PM   #1
Rotary#10
Rotorhead
 
Rotary#10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: "the town " Oakland
iTrader: (1)
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 17
Rotary#10 is on a distinguished road
Default N/A stock air box mod

After considering other forums and posting about moding the stock air box. I recieved considerable feedback that the stock air box is restrictive in flow. Would there be anything I could do besides replacing it, that could be done to it? Here is what I did to it. Keep in mind I have 2 stock air boxes.







Whats your take? Folks tell me to dyno the car with the stock box and my moded box or get it benchflowed.






__________________
Currently running:
90 GTUs converted to S5 TurboII. Track car.
90 N/A GTUs..
Running project car

89 N/A GTUs in Black #2
10/6/18
Blown coolant seal undergoing rebuild and restomod.
Rotary#10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 01:33 PM   #2
RETed
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
iTrader: (1)
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 18
RETed will become famous soon enough
Default

I just question why...since you can just slap on a cone filter and call it a day?


-Ted
__________________
reted_2000@yahoo.com
Technical Advisor
FC3S Pro
http://fc3spro.com/



Quote:
Originally Posted by TitaniumTT View Post
because you're only as good as your backup
RETed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 01:42 PM   #3
Rotary#10
Rotorhead
 
Rotary#10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: "the town " Oakland
iTrader: (1)
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 17
Rotary#10 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RETed View Post
I just question why...since you can just slap on a cone filter and call it a day?


-Ted
Too easy plus you'd have to build a box that keeps out the heat. I have a drop in K&N. Im going for a stock look since I live in smog strict state.
__________________
Currently running:
90 GTUs converted to S5 TurboII. Track car.
90 N/A GTUs..
Running project car

89 N/A GTUs in Black #2
10/6/18
Blown coolant seal undergoing rebuild and restomod.

Last edited by Rotary#10; 05-10-2010 at 01:42 PM.. Reason: Strict smog state
Rotary#10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 02:26 PM   #4
vex
RCC Loves Me Not You
 
vex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
iTrader: (6)
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19
vex will become famous soon enough
Default

So... basically you got rid of the ribbing. Hopefully that ribbing was 1) not structural, and 2) it wasn't there to keep the flow from being laminar.

Turbulent flow>Laminar flow (velocity wise).

My suggestion would be to get rid of the box entirely and start from scratch. Design a box and ducting that would pull in cool air without issue, and still have better flow characteristics than stock.

Something to consider when modifying the car's stock equipment:
1) Design is dictated by 3 things for a mass market.
a) Cost to produce (Material, Tooling, etc)
b) Reliability/Endurance
c) Performance

Choose wisely which one you choose to modify in order to increase the other two.

I bring that up for a simple reason: What you're doing is removing those ridges for a presumed "better" air flow. The trouble is just by logic it doesn't seem to me that it will based on the above.

Cost to produce: Mazda had to produce that intake box, it had to spend money to produce it. What would cost more? A simple box with internally smooth sides, or a box with ribs spaced throughout the interior? If you answered the internally smooth sides, you'd be right. The molds for such a box would be made (tooling cost) relatively simply, with taking a plate and machining the exterior surface to match perfectly. Consequently the stock box is not like that? Why? Do the engineers that designed it know less than we do today? Probably not. In which case there must be a reason for those ribs.

The long and short of it is this: You have basically taken a golf ball with dimples in it and filed the rises down to create a smooth ball. This animation shows how the dimples work:
http://www.livescience.com/common/me...olfBallScience

(sorry for the dreamy voice the guy has)

Something cool:
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80521365/

Last edited by vex; 05-10-2010 at 02:46 PM..
vex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 04:59 PM   #5
Rotary#10
Rotorhead
 
Rotary#10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: "the town " Oakland
iTrader: (1)
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 17
Rotary#10 is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree. Im getting schooled here but I'll take it since Im learning something too.
The ribing isn't structural. The reason for the ribs... mmm
__________________
Currently running:
90 GTUs converted to S5 TurboII. Track car.
90 N/A GTUs..
Running project car

89 N/A GTUs in Black #2
10/6/18
Blown coolant seal undergoing rebuild and restomod.

Last edited by Rotary#10; 05-10-2010 at 05:02 PM..
Rotary#10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com
Ad Management by RedTyger