Crazy NA engines

Jeff20B · 02-18-2009, 08:11 PM

If you were to do a multi-rotor engine, would you want to do peripheral ports only? Or bother with side ports for better low end driveability? You know having four rotors will help driveability even with p-ports.

I feel there is no need to complicate things with side port primaries in the age of fuel injection. Even MFR ports can idle at 1000 with only two rotors. The work peejay has been doing with efi and p-ports is very enouraging. If I were to do a 4 rotor, I'd go with p-ports of a decent size only. No sense messing around with side ports. It was a cool idea, but it's time to get realistico comprendo.

02-18-2009, 08:11 PM	#1
Jeff20B Rotary Fanatic Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 215 Rep Power: 18	If you were to do a multi-rotor engine, would you want to do peripheral ports only? Or bother with side ports for better low end driveability? You know having four rotors will help driveability even with p-ports. I feel there is no need to complicate things with side port primaries in the age of fuel injection. Even MFR ports can idle at 1000 with only two rotors. The work peejay has been doing with efi and p-ports is very enouraging. If I were to do a 4 rotor, I'd go with p-ports of a decent size only. No sense messing around with side ports. It was a cool idea, but it's time to get realistico comprendo.