Go Back   Rotary Car Club > Tech Discussion > Fabrication

Fabrication Show off the parts that you've built from scratch or highly modified

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2015, 05:41 PM   #1
RETed
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19
RETed will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by GySgtFrank View Post
I hate to point this out, as you've done so much nice work on it, but how do you intend to compensate for engine movement? Even with solid motor mounts there is a little bit of movement.
+1

I'm sorry, but having that long, honkin' thing hanging off the TB is still mass dealing with vibration - i.e. physics.
Even if you "spring mount" the AFM, that's even more mass...

Also, stainless steel has this nasty habit of soaking heat.
That duct is hanging over the exhaust exit out of the engine.

There's a reason why Mazda designed it as a rubber flex unit.
If they didn't need have to worry about flex and vibration, a plastic unit would've been lighter and cheaper to install.

I agree that your welding skills are top-notch, but I question the practicality of this application?


-Ted
__________________
reted_2000@yahoo.com
Technical Advisor
FC3S Pro
http://fc3spro.com/



Quote:
Originally Posted by TitaniumTT View Post
because you're only as good as your backup
RETed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2015, 10:41 AM   #2
Pete_89T2
Lifetime Rotorhead
 
Pete_89T2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 874
Rep Power: 16
Pete_89T2 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RETed View Post
+1

I'm sorry, but having that long, honkin' thing hanging off the TB is still mass dealing with vibration - i.e. physics.
Even if you "spring mount" the AFM, that's even more mass...

Also, stainless steel has this nasty habit of soaking heat.
That duct is hanging over the exhaust exit out of the engine.

There's a reason why Mazda designed it as a rubber flex unit.
If they didn't need have to worry about flex and vibration, a plastic unit would've been lighter and cheaper to install.

I agree that your welding skills are top-notch, but I question the practicality of this application?


-Ted
+2, agree with all that Ted & Gunny stated above. WRT the vibration issue, another thing to consider is that your design will effectively transfer engine vibes directly to the AFM, which most likely will cause your car to idle/run like crap. Reason being is the AFM uses a spring loaded opening (flapper door on S4, cone on S5) to measure airflow. Add vibes (or fail to effectively dampen vibes) to such a design and you can guess what happens to the accuracy of the airflow measurement - it will jitter. Since the AFM is the primary sensor used by the FC ECU to control fuel, measurement jitter is very likely to bugger up your idle/running performance.
Pete_89T2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com