|
|||||||
| RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
Lifetime Rotorhead
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 874
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Thanks guys, lots of good recommendations & how-to info here!
Quote:
I'm only talking suspension bushings here; no plans to BDC my car with hockey puck motor mounts For those parts I've already decided to go with the MS parts. I already have the MS engine mounts, need to get the trans mount, front diff & rear diff bushings. May as well, since I'll be in there anyway!Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Good idea, that would make the ball joints on the LCA and sway bar end links serviceable. Are there any downsides to this, besides finding a good set of S4 LCA's? Does this alter suspension geometry at all and require some alignment tweaks? |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
In fact, unless you're really looking for it, I doubt you could tell the difference between identical chassis' with identical mods with the exception of the suspension bushing differences. In terms of STIFFENING the suspension, now most people would realize that there is something different! If you have any type of upgraded suspension components (as most of us do), I doubt you would feel the difference; most would just chalk it up to the other upgrade suspension stuffs. Even going from the stock 205 / 55 / 16 size tire down to a 45-series or 40-series tire is going to jar your spine more. Energy Suspension does very good R&D on their products, so their product claims are spot on. Man, I'm starting to sound like a commercial... (Apologies, as I do not get paid to type all of this.) Quote:
Heat is negligible, and UV is non-existent. -Ted |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|