Go Back   Rotary Car Club > Tech Discussion > Show your rotary car build up.

Show your rotary car build up. Show off your Rotary Car build!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2013, 10:23 PM   #1
Whizbang
Respecognize!
 
Whizbang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Δx = ħ/2Δp
Posts: 3,190
Rep Power: 21
Whizbang will become famous soon enough
by the way, Group 2 for the rotary means "non ported" engine. Group 5 is where you find anything NA and greater than 3.0L adjusted displacement, or forcefully induced (or both). Ported rotaries just get pushed into it.

my friends Integra is a group 2 car (which we are racing this weekend in Az. woot). Its a Honda ITR engine making like 193 whp or some crap. So that is the kind of competition car wise i have to deal with.

and thus i am considering the 13B-MSP since Rx-8 stuff is hella cheap and with stock whatnot, i can make ABOUT that same power level.
__________________
For current updates and event coverage check out
Follow on Twitter! @WhizbangRally
Whizbang Rally's Webpage | Facebook
Whizbang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2013, 03:07 AM   #2
GySgtFrank
Professional Stick Poker
 
GySgtFrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Stafford, Ks.
Posts: 1,012
Rep Power: 16
GySgtFrank will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whizbang View Post
by the way, Group 2 for the rotary means "non ported" engine. Group 5 is where you find anything NA and greater than 3.0L adjusted displacement, or forcefully induced (or both). Ported rotaries just get pushed into it.

my friends Integra is a group 2 car (which we are racing this weekend in Az. woot). Its a Honda ITR engine making like 193 whp or some crap. So that is the kind of competition car wise i have to deal with.

and thus i am considering the 13B-MSP since Rx-8 stuff is hella cheap and with stock whatnot, i can make ABOUT that same power level.
Why not Mazda's 2.5 or 3.0 V6 (if the 3.0 squeaks under the rules)? The 3.0 was rated at 232hp and the things are hella cheap. The V6 would allow you to keep the engine behind the front wheels for weight distribution and they're all aluminum so fairly light. The new series V6s are even lighter and stronger, but I would imagine more costly to get hold of.
__________________
1988 N/A SE 2+2, dead stock and staying that way.
1979 SA22C stock? Not so much.
http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_foru...ad.php?t=15585
GySgtFrank is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com