Dealership Can't fix my problem :-(

[rotar bones]

Is 500 rpm really enough?. My 2004 8 idles at around 750 rpm?.

[chibikougan]

My god people the OP posted this thread in April of 2011 let it die.....


750 rpm is fine...

[RETed]

I don't normally come in this section, but...

...seeing a number of people who would not normally post in an RX-8 section...

It *IS* possible for a lightened flywheel to affect idle...
It is even possible that it could be so light that engine will not be able to run a stable idle.

The flywheel is...a flywheel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel
It stores potential energy, which is definied by it's mass.
Larger the mass -> larger the potential energy stored.
By lowering the mass, the flywheel cannot store as much potential energy now.
Think of it as a "buffer" for the mechanical energy by the engine.
The engine does not produce a steady-state amount of energy at any one time.
Due to it's configuration and design, it's a complex bunch of harmonics of bursts of energy.
This is where a "heavy" flywheel can help.

The old-school guys who used to run insanely light flywheels can atest that these can affect idle like mad.
Couple super lightened flywheels with unsteady idles due to massive porting - i.e. bridges and peripherals - you got one ungodly engine trying to idle properly.
This is why these things do no idle below 1,500RPM's and in some cases up to 2,000RPM's!


-Ted

[rotar bones]

Originally Posted by chibikougan

My god people the OP posted this thread in April of 2011 let it die.....


750 rpm is fine...

Why let it die?. There are new people here every day and to them it isn't old stuff.

When I started to premix it changed my idle completely in that it smoothed it out so that it is hardly noticeable.

[Fendamonky]

Originally Posted by rotar bones

Why let it die?. There are new people here every day and to them it isn't old stuff.

Let me give you a small piece of advice. People on most any forum on the internet tend to get annoyed by "new people" bumping up threads from years earlier simply to make a useless statement.

You, in particular, have managed to piss off or annoy just about every person you've spoken to so far on this forum. I personally find this statement of yours annoying partially because it adds zero value to the thread, but also because you're suddenly trying to play the "new guy" card, after being a raging douche in other threads while trying to validate your "pugilistic" behavior by stating that you've been an owner for many years.

Pick an approach and stick with it, or accept the fact that you're just being a troll.

[rotar bones]

Originally Posted by Fendamonky

Let me give you a small piece of advice. People on most any forum on the internet tend to get annoyed by "new people" bumping up threads from years earlier simply to make a useless statement.

You, in particular, have managed to piss off or annoy just about every person you've spoken to so far on this forum. I personally find this statement of yours annoying partially because it adds zero value to the thread, but also because you're suddenly trying to play the "new guy" card, after being a raging douche in other threads while trying to validate your "pugilistic" behavior by stating that you've been an owner for many years.

Pick an approach and stick with it, or accept the fact that you're just being a troll.

Firstly I don't think this kind of put down conversation belongs here. You can send me a pm if your so pissed off as you call it. This kind of behavior isn't very adult on your part. If you want to put me down , do it in a pm not here son. We can discuss it in a -pm ok. This thread isn't about put downs so please if you have a beef just pm me ok and knock off the Jr attitude ok, I don't care if you like me or not.

[chibikougan]

You said you where leaving and then bagged on the forum as being a problem last night. Please honor that post and just leave.

[RETed]

1) Fendamonkey is right: thread resurrections are frowned upon, especially when nothing new and helpful was offered.
You might think this reply is antagonistic, but these types of replies are trying to steer you in the right direction.
If you're going to keep ignoring these hints, see below...

2) The original poster (OP) posted this one thread and has never logged back on...since posting this thread...in 2011.
Respect the OP's thread and leave it alone.
No one really addressed the question about the flywheel part EXCEPT ME, so I can consider all the other replies as "fluff."
You're welcome to send a PM directly to the OP, but don't hold your breath for a response.
I have been on certain online forums where thread resurrections (anywhere from 6 months to a year) can be considered a disciplinary infraction of the rules.
A better approach is to START A NEW THREAD and then REFERENCE BACK TO THE OLD THREAD WITH A LINK, if you really insist you need to do this.

3) Mr. rotar bones, you're already threading on thin ice.
We can turn around and lecture you about YOU sending your particular reply through PM as a more appropriate means and not dirtying this thread.
The above reply does not constitute anything new or helpful to the original thread.
AGAIN, I REMIND YOU THIS IS A TECH SUBSECTION.
You might think you're safe by not blatantly break any obvious rules, but keep this negative attitude up with this type of unnecessary replies in public, and you will be banned very quickly.
AGAIN, I REMIND YOU THAT YOU ARE BEING MONITORED VERY CLOSELY AT THIS POINT IN TIME.


Since we're on that note...
Unless someone has a good reason to keep this thread open, I'm closing it.


-Ted