|
RX-7 3rd Gen Specific (1993-2002) RX-7 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
The Judge
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Many of you are missing the point of the comparison, and you have let your emotions overide your reasoning capacity.
Yes a 400hp LS1 will outlast a 400hp rotary. The idea was what if they both made the same hp/L then how would they compare. We are talking about engine stress. Would a 877whp LS1 in a vette fair as well as for a dayly driver? Last edited by cewrx7r1; 04-16-2008 at 02:09 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Rotary Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B'ham, AL
Posts: 329
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
hp/l IS a valid argument from a physics stand point. Is it how the public looks at hp, no, but it is a valid argument when it comes to reliability and how much stress an engine will take. A 400hp LS1 is not near as stressed as a rotory, 2.0l I-4, 3.0l v-6 etc. So an equally powerd LS1 is more reliable. All CW is saying is, would a 877whp LS1 be as or more reliable than a 400hp rotary?? It's not how much power you can make or is a rotary better than an LS1. You could use a 5.0 ford or a 5.9 chrysler in the same argument, he's not attacking LS1s, they are just the typical swap.
__________________
1993 Rx-7 SM2 #11 At the local AutoX: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VOSQkkSLQs Speed for Sale shootout 2007: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiqlyAkGmpg A few laps at Barbers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_h5q...x=0&playnext=1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|