|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
KTEC
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 642
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
Not really. Its to reduce friction on the crank to gain more a few more HP. Especially in the top end of NA cars.
__________________
what I have: 1985 Gs:12a All motor Drag car - 1973 Rx2: Play car What I had: 93 Touring: TRADED - 91 Coupe: TRADED - 90 GTU: RHD - 88 10AE: SOLD - 87 Base: SOLD - 86 Base: SOLD - 1985 GSLSE - 85 Gsl: SOLD - 80 Gs: TRADED - 1972 Rx2 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lifetime Rotorhead
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 874
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
^These are both valid advantages for an E-water pump. Being able to control flow rate independent of RPM helps to optimize the efficiency of the cooling system, all other things being the same, and switching to an EWP should get you a net reduction in parasitic loads at the crank. I say "net reduction" because the electrical power needed to run an EWP isn't free - the alternator will have to work harder (more drag on the crank) to produce that power. The question is does the increase in parasitic drag from the alternator get offset by a larger decrease in parasitic drag from the mechanical water pump?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Sigh.....
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 2,377
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
1986 Sport: 132k miles, 5A (Sapphire Blue Metallic), Tokico Blues, Racing Beat Springs, Custom LED tailights (only S4 LED tails in the world), SSR Mark II, Racing Beat exhaust, S5 black interior, Rotary Resurrection rebuild at 120k miles Community Service Manual RotorWiki "Imagination costs nothing; we could build square locomotives or fly to Mars" - Felix Wankel Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|