N/A or Turbo

[RETed]

There's no need to raise the redline if the engine doesn't significantly make more power at the higher RPM's.


-Ted

[Libor]

Originally Posted by Raksj04

Most people use a 4 port engine without a turbo because it was what they had to get the car driviable.

No. They use 4 port engine because its superior for power and torque production, no matter what porting is applied to irons...

Originally Posted by Raksj04

Does a N/A benifit from a higher redline then a turbo engine?

Its quite strange question. Turbo engine is very same as NA engine, it just operates in different absolute pressures. Certainly, once you reach maximum torque you can produce in NA engine, only way to increase power is to carry this torque to higher rpms and high rpms=huge stress and wear on everything. So in case of turbo engine, its always better to turn up the boost then trying to spin it to the moon

Originally Posted by RETed

There's no need to raise the redline if the engine doesn't significantly make more power at the higher RPM's.

-Ted

+1

To the OP, if your system will be really optimized, it could go over 250 HP@crank. That being said, most streetported 13Bs are probably making around 220 HP... It depends on to much things...

[Pettersen]

What would i need to do in order to run RX8 rotors?

[Libor]

Originally Posted by Pettersen

What would i need to do in order to run RX8 rotors?

A few things which aren´t worth a hassle given the fact, that RX8 rotors were already proved to be inferior to S5 NA rotors in any measurable aspect, mainly in power pruduction...

You don´t even need high comp rotors, great power can be made on lower CR ratio, you just tune accordingly...

[Pettersen]

Well a few things have been decided.

I'm going semi pp and with 9.7 Rotors, and all the nececary machining and parts to get it able to run high rpm's.