|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-27-2011, 04:23 PM | #16 | ||
The Newbie
|
Quote:
http://www.tweakit.net/shop/product_...roducts_id=117 http://www.twminduction.com/Throttle...leBody-FR.html http://www.twminduction.com/ThrottleBody/carb_vs_fi.pdf Quote:
Turbocharging is good for a street rotary because you can gain horsepower and torque without gaining excessive noise. The downside is that you will want to upgrade the drivetrain to TII specs in order to handle that extra torque, and the engine turbo upgrade isn't all that cheap or easy unless you use mostly stock TII parts, although that is also an option. I am not sure if there are still cheap J-Spec TII engines available from Japan after the recent disaster. |
||
03-28-2011, 04:20 AM | #17 | ||||
RCC Addict
|
Quote:
13B-REW is running 9.0:1 rotors. The non-turbo S5 13B already runs higher compression rotors. If you're going to strip the intake manifolds anyways, get ITB's and savor your top end performance. Quote:
That doesn't make any sense. If you're going to this extreme, most people would opt for almost everything aftermarket anyways - arguing stock parts is a waste of time. I don't get the hate for the ignition triggers either... The stock FC CAS is superior, IMNSHO, than the FD igniton trigger wheel. Both do the same thing, and outside of the physical appearance, both output basically the same signal. I've seen FD mag pick-up's FAIL; I've never seen an FC CAS fail yet. The FC CAS is superior cause it's enclosed - no worried about crap being throw at it, as exposed mag pick-up's are susceptible to debris and damage. (Racers who have run the Electromotive set-up have already proven this.) So it just sounds like you just don't like the way it "looks"... Same goes with the belts... Quote:
The non-turbo 13B 6-port engines run more duration on it's 6-port intake ports. Quote:
-Ted |
||||