View Single Post
Old 10-10-2009, 10:58 PM   #12
NoDOHC
The quest for more torque
 
NoDOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Posts: 855
Rep Power: 17
NoDOHC will become famous soon enough
Quote:
PP is not a bad option (although it will guzzle fuel). Really the PP and the turbo will have similar power bands and similar power levels. The fuel consumption will likely be comparable too. (The turbo is easier to do, the PP will run cooler and be lighter)
Wow! I should be more careful with my wording. Obviously, the turbo will not rev as high as the PP, and will make more torque down low (once the turbo spools). By power band, I was meaning that you will experience a low-rev power deficiency with both configurations.

I think that if you keep the PP downshifted, your throttle response would be better than with the turbo. You will probably have to shift less frequently with the turbo.

I think that a NA streetport would be fun on a hillclimb, mine makes pretty good torque from about 3,000 rpm to 9,000 rpm (good broad rpm range is better for racing as you are not always in the wrong gear).

I sure hope I get those rotors changed before the snow flies. (It is not currently looking good).
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers)
1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic)
NoDOHC is offline   Reply With Quote