COOL! Can't wait to see some updated stuff!

Want to show the true performance figures too :driving: won't be long :icon_tup: when I do I'll list it up against some other fancy super/sports cars that have been tested with VBOX equipment and put it up as a comparison :)

Nice knives! :D oh and the FD is pretty sweet too... ;)

Just finished a major (for me) upgrade of my baby :)

Changed the turbocharger specifications, water cooling circuits, Turbine outlet exit, line insulation & placement (oil water and re routing to the letter of "ideal installation" which made a notable/distinct difference for the better), New EGT probes too, and new braking system! Did a service today as well, will take some pics and post them soon.

The thing is just TITS , my dream car.

Drove her today :) its sweeter than a fat chic molesting a bucket of KFC!

louder with new turbo (at cruise), runs better, cooler, fixed the hot start "clicking" *boiling near thermostat* due to wrong water line mountings in first install :o21:
New EGT probes are sweet too. Cleaned some items and reworked a few bits I was not happy with and it came up pretty good


:party:


http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/6884/img2153matt.jpg

http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/8779/img2156matt.jpg

http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/4882/img2149matt.jpg

Very nice!!

Thanks mate :)

I also put on a new leading coil and some NGK plug wires :auto:
It's just perfect now :willy_nilly: love the set up and all the hard work I put into it :fawk:

Reduced the EGT by over 100deg C :reddevil: :coolgleamA:

Still bedding in the new brake rotors and pads so did not go spastic on testing it yet (cause you do have to stop in a hurry !) but its making more power at lower boost and lower rpm than the first iteration of the set up which is a nice thing to see... needed some fine tuning with the new turbocharger (more injector opening to give same AFR on smaller turbo) :conehead:

Will hook up the VBOX3i and do a full ANALysis of it in net couple of weeks
It sounds gay but I just like looking at it as much as starting it up and listening to the sweet rotary noise (let alone the driving!) Mazda's are the best :auto:

Here is some preliminary information comparing two different specification (turbine section) Turbochargers.

1.00A/R Garrett T04Z (from circuit test)
RRWEP110 = 3 turns
266 rwkw @ 6950 rpm AFR 11.35:1
Boost 18.45 psi
Turbine inlet pressure 17.1 psi
Exhaust pressure 4.06 psi
Turbo speed 101803 rpm
90kmh-140kmh = 3.05 seconds
100kmh-200kmh = 8.20 seconds
EGT = failed probe after 35 hours (was around 1000 or so at lower boost and power)

modified turbine specification (today run)
RRWEP110 = 4 turns
268 rwkw @ 7250 rpm AFR 11.0:1 (1.7 degrees less timing)
Boost 16.72 psi
Turbine inlet pressure 14.43 psi
Exhaust pressure 4.03 psi
Turbo speed 101000 rpm
90kmh-140kmh = 3.25 seconds (10% incline rose 9m in 100m of test) *minus the incline these times are net equal from my experience*
EGT Fr 875 deg C
EGT Rr 885 deg C


I wanted to be careful so I richened up the car and also took a few percent off the timing, the fueling curve is not optimized like it was on the smaller turbo, I have refined the mapping and also have reset the boost controller so it can learn the pattern of the new turbo from scratch then it will on a flat road perform better in like conditions to the 1.00A/R set up. Car has more top end pull as is and when the boost learns the loss down low will be marginal.

You can see from the figures, that the Exhaust pressure *indicator of mass flow* is near identical for them both so this is one of my many cross checks to make sure no spurious figures are around, also the Turbine RPM is basically the same as well though this turbo has an aero nut V’s the other which when rebuilt had only a normal hex nut (whatever if any difference that makes lol). The Turbine inlet pressure is definitely less as you can see from the figures and despite the non optimized tune up it makes the same power and at high rpm so the engine is less restricted by this exhaust housing (which matches with the theory 100%) the car on power is QUIETER with this set up *unless I am on drugs* my theory on this is because less mass flow is going out the waste gate pipe (more through the turbine) and this must be making the car less noisy at full power as all other things are exactly the same from last time.

I have reset the boost controller to learn 1.35kg/cm which equals 19.2psi, with the slightly tweaked set up (back to original timing) half turn less on RRWEP110 injector (down from 4 full turns) and tidied up spots in rpm range to give perfect AFR line (target 11.2:1 to 11.3:1 AFR) it *should* get to around 290rwkw on my VBOX measure (this is like 319rwkw on homo dynamics?)………….. anyway hope I have not bored you to death!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I get around to driving it again will see what she does, should not be long as I have all the VBOX gear fitted in her so it’s just a matter of driving it. My best 90kmh to 140kmh time is 2.75 seconds at lower fuel load, flat road, (18psi average boost) and non heat soaked engine.

A few things here...
first, your brake booster is on the wrong side ;)

I like the datalogging... but it's getting tedious converting all these numbers to something that I can understand :rofl:

I'm curious as to why you think the EGT's went down by so much.

And that airbox is total sex.... LOVE it

After consulting with BDC and HC my theory is as follows :dunno:

After consulting with myself my theory is as follows.......
Turbine expansion ratio is 1.55 on the new set up, it was 1.70 on the older set up thus 32% was "wasted" out the waste gate v's only 11% when running this turbo charger. The amount of heat held in by the smaller turbo is shown by the EGT and also the pressure (power level being equal) which I got as close as is possible in this test to demonstrate my point. Thus the EGT difference is down to the free flow nature of the turbine not retaining as much heat to make up for lower flow (energy balance to drive compressor is derived from heat, pressure, and flow rate) to keep the turbine spinning at the same rpm (to make the same power).

The car is also quieter on full throttle/power v's the other set up, due to a majority of the gas needing to go through the turbine, nice side effect :hurray:

Yeah the air box and lots of stuff in the bay is SEX, I spent so much time making allot of it, its nice to sit back and just stare at it :117:

More "box" for you :smilielol5:

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1052/img2150box.jpg

It's a **** :smash: to work on, as everything goes on in a certain order, and you need lots of special tools but its something no one else can copy too, so pretty unique (kinda matches the car).

I have a fair bit of information to pass on (need to collated it first) but here is a quick rundown of today’s work.

Boost re-learn at 1.35kg/cm
3rd gear pull from 2500rpm = 1+ bar or ~15psi boost by 4300rpm
4th gear pull from same revs = 15+psi by 3600rpm

VBOX3i results (on boost learning) max boost at this stage was like 1.25kg/cm or about 17.2psi
90-140kmh = 2.88 seconds, showed 272rwkw on Blitz power logging at 6800rpm and same power on my VBOX dyno plot (272rwkw @ 7000rpm)
Repeated same test in exact same location as the small incline (so I could overlay graphs and see difference to flat piece of road and it ran 3.07 seconds (v’s the 3.25 yesterday) exact same vehicle weight (cross checked on corner scales this morning ).. AFR on these pulls was 11.1 to 11.0 across the range all smoothed out and boost was pretty similar to the first run where I did the comparison for you.. so trim of fuel mixture helped the time improvement.

So after lunch I poured over the data and did some more trimming (2% reduction of fuel map) and went for a cruise. I gave it a few hits and it felt unreal in 2nd gear :auto: and partially in 3rd as well, on the way back on a nice stretch I pulled out to pass 3 cars and gave it the jandle from 3000rpm to 8000rpm and it was so strong! Stronger than a fat slut bench pressing buckets of KFC!!! The on board power meter showed 298rwkw @ 7200 rpm and held over 280rwkw to 7800rpm with don mega mid range power too. Boost was 1.35kg/cm or 19.2psi on the Blitz dyno graph log at these revs. So another 0.10kg/cm boost and a small fuel trim (along with refitting my old ignition timing map) made all the difference, oh and I turned the RRWEP110 down to 3.5 turns. AFR across board from 4000rpm to 8000rpm (75kpa to 140kpa gauge boost) is ~11.2:1 +-0.1.

I’ll wait for a cool morning and take out the 20kg worth of spare tire, tools, fire extinguisher! And run it at ¼ tank of fuel and I should beat my 2.75 second 90-140 record. As a side note when I was at track and it was doing 90-140 in 3.05 second range, I did 100kmh to 200kmh in 8.1 to 8.2 seconds range at same weight (1350kg total). I’ll hope to do this in 7 seconds flat now as now I can hold 4th gear due to the much better top end power with no loss of 4700rpm to 7100rpm power range (as measured in the 90-140 tests in 3rd gear).

It’s a win mate. :fawk:

Polished the bad boy today, fucken in love :o13:

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/2548/img2175plish.jpg

http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/5...g2197plish.jpg

Well :)

Fitted up the new waste gate springs yesterday bought option of 1.3 bar and 1.4 bar Tail springs (combination of different inner and outers). I settled on the lower 1.3bar combo just in case they gave a higher set boost. Along with the new higher power setting I upgraded the specification of the spark plugs and some other details too.

Took the "beast" out for a drive today and the boost went to 1.53 to average of 1.50kg/cm! which is around 1.47 to 1.50bar! or old money 21+psi boost :) .......... it pulls like a mother fucker! First 3 2nd gear acceleration runs just torches the rear semi slick tires to 8000rpm, after about 6 or more passes and a few 3rd gear pulls the rear tires got very hot and sticky and could "almost" use all of the extra grunt in 2nd gear (only in straight line though and perfect road surface).... third gear is just stupid and is over in a couple of seconds, its very fast now.

Fuel duty before was around 67% > now 75% same AFR
Power on the Blitz was just under 300rwkw
Peak fuel pressure was 70psi now its around 75psi
EGT peaks have not gone above 890deg C

First cool morning will go out and do a test of the 90-140kmh and also do a 100kmh to 200kmh acceleration test report along with VBOX power graph.

hit my goal
 

:reddevil: 305rwkw as measured by me :conehead:

Did a 90-140km 3rd gear test but battery went flat before all data could be written *I know excuses lol* covered the speed increment in 85m, previous best was 88m, off ECU data logging and given this distance its around 2.62 seconds which is Ferrari F40 beating territory.

Boost on 3rd gear pull from 2500rpm
130kpa (18.9psi) ~ 4400rpm
145kpa (21psi) ~ 5000rpm
holding to 8000rpm
Turbo speed is 110,000+rpm now lol
EGT fr 928 deg C rr 930 deg C peak.
AFR 11.3:1

After the boost controller learned the new spring the power delivery is so violent in 2nd gear even with warm semi slicks it just throws the car sideways down the road and leaves two black lines on the road :fawk: its sick :hurray:

From my best estimates its making around 490bhp to 500bhp at the engine corrected to std temp and pressure. Through a full catalyst equipped exhaust that is very quiet for road running *sounds nice at full power and revs* Engine has logged over 100 hours of use now at pretty high power settings, covered over 5000km testing.

Hope to update with some nice VBOX graphs soon, though the weather here is shit at the moment, stupidly hot and monsoon conditions daily :rant:

Man your car is sick clean. Nice to see your putting the effort in getting your car tuned right. Can't wait to have my car put back together. Had it apart for painting....

That is a impressive set up man. I have to agree, thats a nice air box you got there

Thanks, good to see some shared love :auto:

Today I started fabricating a new camera mount, as no matter how many fancy graphs and top shelf information I put up people still seem to respond more to video footage :banghead: Will be good to share with the average punter just how bullshit good the acceleration is :coolgleamA:

I'll upload video and VBOX test report to my web site and link it here too :conehead:

How level does the surface have to be to get accurate numbers from the VBOX?

My G-Tech gives dramatically different numbers if I am going uphill or downhill. It reads higher going up a hill. I know that the VBOX is to the G-Tech what a machine gun is to a dart gun, but I am curious what is required for a test setup.

The level makes no difference in a VBOX unlike a G-Tech which only works off an G reading. The G is derived via GPS doppler measure. On my VBOX3i I use also an accel and gyro unit which corrects for use in noisy (read satellite challenged area's). So I can have the ultimate/highest dynamic setting on my VBOX with no draw backs.

When you are coming to testing standards then I always use a known area that is flat within less than 0.5% over the distance, this is only so I have a relative comparison over the many hundreds of logs I have on file from cars I test. As any incline or decline has an effect on the vehicle performance... Any formula can be set up in the VBOX as it measures altitude variations so the power will always be correct ;) but as stated for ideal vehicle performance always a flat track is best. Corrections can be applied for all normal atmospheric changes due to altitude or temperature as well, this is all common practice but is up to the end user to apply. As VBOX is used by engineers the company does not offer any of this stuff to you in "software" you develop it all yourself :willy_nilly:

The G-Tech can be a good tool if you respect these limits on basic devices like the Tesla item, > here is a factory proper lab test comparing it to various VBOX units.... its a good read and what got me into VBOX in the first place ! http://www.ausrotary.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=143457

Direct link to test http://www.performancebox.co.uk/down...CHvPB_Test.pdf

Here is the finished camera mount :conehead: got the position good *I think* same as what I had it before I think, will test it out soon :Angel_anim:

http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/6...2294camera.jpg

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7...2289camera.jpg

I have edited video showing the beast (beating all but 1 F40 and having no respect for tire grip!) , but youtube is going BDC style and failing on me :ack2: so until then here is some reading :)

60mph to 85mph now is .......................... 2.11 seconds basically exactly equal to the USA F40 for which I have a VBOX test from an owner *above* his was on small decent too! so artificially fast in my books.
100-140kmh is 2.10 seconds 70.36 meters (EURO F40 apparently does 2.0 seconds and 67.60 meters but have only ever found one magazine test on that, fastest one ever recorded too btw) listed earlier on.

Basically It's allot faster than the all but one of the Ferrari F40's listed *euro F40 Italian test, probably a boosted up special lol* (USA ones tested by Road and Track I obliterate in same rpm speed tests.)

I have a video of it and will do up a VBOX report showing the boost, back pressure, EGT, Turbine speed, and all the shit I do...... its a very impressive car for what it is. Hiring an air port not far from me for some high speed testing and full performance review. If you compare it to the Domar Jap 500ps cars that cant char the semi slicks as hard as mine nor accelerate no where near as quickly its even more impressive. I love it.

Additional information 17th Dec 2010 test update
60-130mph for RICESP at Aerodrome test is 8.62 seconds (lot faster than the VBOX proof from the F40)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2YVuJg4rSg

As fast as a Pagani Zonda and Ferrari F40, I'll put up the VBOX proof later :hurray:

RICESP is 1.84 seconds in 65.38 meters
*Pagani Zonda its test is slighly down hill so I will call myself just as fast! probably faster, have more top end G *acceleration* where as it's Mazzive 6+lt N/A V12 has a superior spread of power*. (It traps 128mph in 400m test) we both do similar 0-100kmh times for what its worth (within 0.1 seconds). I'll update with a full test when time permits ;) along with overlays between the two cars :)


EDIT (additional info, back up of first result)
17th Dec 2010 TESTS RICESP is 1.82 seconds in 64.53 meters *From Aerodrome test* SO ITS *officially* FASTER THAN A ZONDA !

:conehead: Here is the graph showing some detail of various parameters & performance. Average figures between test lines shown (Avg-b) *report screen* and peak on datum line of graph in top left box snapshot of instant Graph data figures at that point.

http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/7...sttesttest.jpg

I'll post up some other incremental times of the F40, I have 3 separate tests (one factory) two independent (USA and UERO models) and on peak power band test 60mph to 90mph and 70mph to 90mph I have ........

(Peak power band for all cars)

60mph-90mph
EURO F40 = 2.70 seconds
USA F40 = 2.90 seconds
RICESP = 2.59 seconds

70mph-90mph
EURO F40 = 1.90 seconds
USA F40 = 2.10 seconds
RICESP = 1.76 seconds

^ back this up with 2.56 and 1.73 seconds (on a quite damp track too) ;) so no one hit wonder :)

Just out of curiosity how is your bottom end. Do you have enough pull out of corners IE is the car good for the track or just high power runs?

Did you watch the youtube video? it is insane. for spread of power. In 2nd gear I just roll onto it really gently as if I stab it at low revs I end up off the road (this is why I have traction control fitted, but turned off in that vid to illustrate the power).

I have full 20psi boost at 4400rpm (not just the boost but the power is very strong from these revs onwards, its average power is flat out unreal from 4k to 8k rpm very flexible for a 13B engine) :auto: the whole set up is more around mid range power rather than anything to do with top end :coolgleamA:

I could improve it even more by dropping the exhaust system pressure by not running a catalyst, but I like it legal and the sound is really nice too in note and volume.

Well I am impressed that you are running a cat converter. This is something I will have to install this year. Just surprised you do not burn through those cat converters. Do you have a air pump attached to your catalyst? Do you have to pass emissions?

You tube says you're video is private.

We have 3 gas analysis machines at work and the emissions are better than original and well under the specifications. I spent allot of time on fuel atomization and tuning to make that happen and also to make the CAT's live.

On that side I only use SMB & Performance Weaponry Catalysts, this has been a long term test project between us on this and their offering has delivered in power and durability and ultimately measured performance against known iconic cars :) it's nice to have the real engineering data on their abilities too showing the effect of pressure and turbine response and to a greater degree the power restriction in running such a device in a car of this proven power and performance.

Last time I checked the CAT it was excellent, I believe the only thing that kills these types of things is long term running on non ideal *chemically correct* mixtures at low speeds (especially cruise) where the rich mixture has time to react in the body and thus overheat and kill it. Full throttle and high gas flows dont kill cats as there is not enough time for the reaction to happen and thus little more temp build up apart from what is in the system at the point anyway *and this is reflected in the beginning and end AFR value you measure*.

Glad you like it :) I absolutely love it :302: was always my goal to equal Ferrari F40 performance, infact its better than allot of modern day alternatives... even the famed ZRI that only generates 0.48G accel at 81mph or 130kmh V's my RICESP @ 0.52G :fawk:

:conehead:

Wow! Emissions legal. Your impressive numbers are even more impressive now.

Thanks man,

I worked very hard to achieve this set up :117:
It was allot of fun doing the research and also history check of the supercars I compare my RICESP special too :hurray:

Not sure if most appreciate it :dunno: but there is a full time job alone in learning all of the VBOX stuff and the way I have applied it to measure power and do the things I want it to do. It's been a great adventure along the way, had the odd little set back :angelsad2: but I worked it all out and with the support of some great friends giving me motivation more than anything I showed that despite ANY set back or numerous hater attacks against you that you can win through and class/brains/god given talent wins in the end, no matter what haters/cunts may say about you or your car :Angel_anim:

Like we all know, its easy to open your wallet and charge up the credit card to get people to build you a car or many parts of it, its another thing all together to design, build, tune, and test/prove it all 100% yourself :reddevil:

That is a fact. It may cost more, but you get the knowlege too.

I would love to be able to afford your toys and do my own development (I can barely afford to pay a couple hundred bucks for a dyno pull).

For the record, your car pulls harder in 3rd than mine does in 2nd. INSANE!

Keep up the good work!

New record for my little cat equipped road going RX7 100kmh to 200kmh of 7.53 seconds! :auto: :fawk:

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/9...00kmto200k.jpg

http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/5983/airstrip.jpg

Nice video man! So if my math is right you are around 410rwhp correct?
That thing IS the definition of the rotary rocket :)

Glad to see you have finally beared fruit after all your hard work. I will agree that if your research is not 100% you wlll see a higher failure rate in the rotary then in conventional piston reciprocating engines.

That was the exact reason why my 13BT destroyed itself. I should have spent more time researching, I went farther then most '"average" rotary gearheads in regards to build precision, thermal control/scavenging and knock deterrents but not quite the 100% distance. I do hope in the future when my Family life slows down and my free time comes back to be involved again in a turbo rotary build with water injection.

For now my LS1 swap will have to satisfy my desire for a high power reliable engine that doesn't need as much attention.

Anyway, great job on the FD man. Very impressive craftsmanship. Enjoy it!!

Thanks very much.

On the power side its always an interesting debate/comparison. Mine is my own measure based on pure physics and engineering, I can't comment for others which vary depending on what dyno type people use. All I will say on the topic is my car accelerates faster and harder from 100kmh to 200kmh that some peoples RX7's that weight 120kg less and make (435rwhp as measured on a dyno dynamics machine!). **** Here is the link to an apparent 500+S-BHP (435rwhp Dyno Dynamics RX7 of 1180kg as run!) **** http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=631485&page=5 ........... you see why I value these toilet paper prints outs so highly :) 8.3++ seconds to my 7.53 seconds is an eternity.

(Below: stolen from gay shit hole club)
Just got back from Re-Worx !
Great job Geff and Max ! well done.

We mapped the car on E85
1600 and 850cc injectors are not enough with a base fuel pressure of 4.1BAR
We mapped at 0.9 Bar turbo pressure

all temps are just fine.. no knock no nothing
qoute from Geff: This engine likes running LEAN

432.2HP at the wheels at 0.9 BAR

flywheel
http://www.jeroentje.nl/media/foto/7011.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvcxX...layer_embedded 100kmh to 200kmh in 8.5 seconds!
*see what I mean* full throttle, full boost (actually higher than on dyno) 120kg less weight than me. And optimistic wheel speed sensors so in actual fact its probably slower than this indicated speed.

My long held experience after using almost every type of rolling road dyno over almost 2 decades is the vast majority of them are bullshit (over optimistic). This is why I bought my VBOX and developed my own power calculations as I know I can trust them and they do measure up to other cars in reality (production supercars).

There was a classic case of this on Motortrend a while back testing a R35GTR on a dynojet (using a guessing factor to estimate engine power @ 507bhp) then they took it to a real dyno that could calculate coast down power and actual wheel power (390awhp) and they worked out 485bhp V's factory spec of 480bhp. I have been lucky enough to work with both engine dyno and dynapack chassis dyno as a full time job at a University developing a FSAE power train, and I also got to exercise my development of my own power measure based on in vehicle tests so pretty much have seen it all and the variations you get between them.

My most important thing these days is spread of power (not just the peak), bit like your V8 conversion, its no point having a metric shit load :9898: of top end power and then never being able to translate that into any type of vehicle speed. The 100kmh to 200kmh test is graphic illustration of this, separates the dyno sheet racers from the people who can actually make a fast and reliable rotary :reddevil:

Over on the fag forum there was a bloke who listed up data logs of his ~1100kg RX7 that makes 435rwhp (dyno dynamics) on T04Z street port on E85 fuel (gutted open race exhaust) and on his video and data logging its doing 100kmh to 200kmh (off optimistic wheel speed sensors too!) in 8.3+ seconds.

I am very happy with my car and love the package :conehead: nice that people here appreciate it as well, happy to share the information with enthusiasts who can appreciate the level of work and dedication it takes to make and prove beyond any doubt how fast a true street rotary can be :reddevil:

I have been into rotaries since 1992 (bought my first RX7) and in all that time I can say I have not till now felt content with a car and its set up. After taking the beast out for a drive now I cant do the typed word justice in trying to express how fucking awesome it is to have a quiet nice to drive rotary, that behaves beautifully, drives nice, and is fuel efficient and able to be filled up anywhere and driven over 900km on a single tank of fuel :001_302: It's a top long distance touring machine, something you just don't seen anymore with poofter fueled (E85 shitbox's) and rampant excuse machines that never do anything or go anywhere, except on tow trucks or trailers to the pusher (I mean workshop) for a undercover rebuild between BS dyno sheet postings or $10 plastic trophy battles of glory :smilielol5:

It's not the most powerful car I have owned, nor by any stretch the fastest I have been tuned or developed for customers, but its by far the best all round package. It's smooth as silk, and one brief step of the pedal away its an animal all in one set up, the video's just don't do it justice as to how the nose lifts when you stand on the throttle in 3rd gear and at such low rpm......... and the sweeeeeeeet rotary noise through the SMB exhaust is sex. :o16:

Anyone who does not get to feel the rotary enjoyment all I can tell you is that if you work at it (never give up) and put in half as much work as I have you too can feel the love :001_302:

No you see why I have very little respect for common "chassis dyno's" FFS the Dyno Homo Dynamics is meant to read much lower than a Dynojet! and it reads a shit load lower than a Dynapack, and I say and can prove that the figures coming of a Dyno Homo Dynamics are totally FICTIONAL! not represent by any form of reality! :smash: :squint:

My real power measure is on average 15% to 18% lower than the Aussie DD!!! but its REAL POWER!! not made up bullshit with all kinds of hidden factors in the calculations!!!! and it matches REALITY and other cars from real manufacturers and also basics to do with fuel usage, Volutmetric efficiency, thermal efficiency, and vehicle performance. My RX7 only has around 480bhp to 490bhp at my estimate at the current setting, that is what the engineering says......... not a worthless dyno sheet from some doctored estimating guessing machine.

It's no wonder NONE of the cars who sprout of dyno sheet figures can give matching acceleration proof compared to "real supercars" say like a Ferrari F40 that weighs in at 1400kg and only uses a ~480bhp engine power form of propulsion :smash::smash::smash::smash::smash::smash::smash:: smash:

:lol::nopity: Dyno Sheets! :nopity::lol:

I dedicated a whole thread to it here > http://www.ausrotary.com/viewtopic.p...it=kerb+weight and typically only old school people who have allot of experience understand the reality of what we face in the modern HYPE world :o15:

RICESP does 8500rpm limiter in 5th gear = 329kph or ~205mph+
100kmh to 200kmh in 7.53 seconds as a comparison to these cars below

HI EVERYBODY,
i found a nice comparison between some of the Fastest Extreme Sport Cars made, i though it would have been nice to post the results obtained in this Test:

SPEEDS
100kM/H = 62mph
200kM/H = 124mph
250kM/H = 155mph
300kM/H = 186mph


Dodge Viper SRT-10 506hp V10
0-100km/h 4.0s
0-200km/h 13.8s
0-250km/h 24.3s
0-300km/h failed
TOPSPEED 298km/h (185mph)

=

Porsche 997 Turbo 480hp flat6
0-100km/h 3.7s
0-200km/h 12.3s
0-250km/h 20.7s
0-300km/h 40.7s
TOPSPEED 310km/h (192mph)

==

Corvette Z06 513hp V8
0-100km/h 3.8s
0-200km/h 11.9s
0-250km/h 19.0s
0-300km/h 41.8s
TOPSPEED 315km/h (195mph)

===

Aston Martin Vanquish S 528hp V12
0-100km/h 5.3s
0-200km/h 16.5s
0-250km/h 30.4s
0-300km/h 57.1s
TOPSPEED 317km/h (196mph)

====

Mercedes SLR McLaren 626hp V8
0-100km/h 3.8s
0-200km/h 11.2s
0-250km/h 18.5s
0-300km/h 36.9s
TOPSPEED 324km/h (201mph)

=====

Ford GT 550hp V8
0-100km/h 3.9s
0-200km/h 12.0s
0-250km/h 19.0s
0-300km/h 33.6s
TOPSPEED 330km/h (205mph)

======

Ferrari 599 GTB 620hp V12
0-100km/h 3.5s
0-200km/h 10.3s
0-250km/h 16.6s
0-300km/h 28.9s
TOPSPEED 335km/h (209mph)

=======

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 640hp V12
0-100km/ 3.4s
0-200km/h 11.2s
0-250km/h 17.7s
0-300km/h 31.8s
TOPSPEED 340km/h (212mph)

========

Pagani Zonda S 555hp V12
0-100km/h 3.7s
0-200km/h 9.8s
0-250km/h 17.4s
0-300km/h 25.8s
TOPSPEED 345Km/h (215mph)

=========

Koenigsegg CCX 806hp V8
0-100km/h 2.9s
0-200km/h 9.2s
0-250km/h 12.5s
0-300km/h 16.7s
TOPSPEED 395km/h (245mph)

==========

Bugatti Veyron 1001hp W16
0-100km/h 2.6s
0-200km/h 7.4s
0-250km/h 11.4s
0-300km/h 18.2s
TOPSPEED 406km/h (253mph)