View Full Version : FC3S Header Talk
Whizbang
11-30-2008, 11:34 AM
Who makes the best header for the 13B in our second generation cars? I hear a lot of this and that about what design is better over another, but rarely any proof.
TehMonkay
11-30-2008, 03:12 PM
SDJ was the best but rotary innovation went under however another person bought the rights to reproduce it, they're on rx-7 club.
farberio
11-30-2008, 03:58 PM
And they don't make them.
There are a couple of sources for headers, the question you should ask is do I want to pay the money for them? You are talking $500-700
TehMonkay
11-30-2008, 04:24 PM
Last i checked they made a couple of one offs for the right price.
need RX7
11-30-2008, 06:10 PM
Anyone know anything about what design elements (pipe diameter, length, bends, etc) make for best torque/horsepower, and optimizing powerband and stuff like that? Like for someone who was going to fabricate their own?
farberio
11-30-2008, 06:24 PM
Last i checked they made a couple of one offs for the right price.
I called a couple of times and they said they were too busy to make any.
farberio
11-30-2008, 06:28 PM
Anyone know anything about what design elements (pipe diameter, length, bends, etc) make for best torque/horsepower, and optimizing powerband and stuff like that? Like for someone who was going to fabricate their own?
A lot of it has to do with your own car, port types and the like. R&D is everything.
There is some good info here, just ignore the flywheel junk.
http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=801325
Flooder
11-30-2008, 06:54 PM
Racing beat. Nuff said.
Fidelity101
11-30-2008, 08:02 PM
Well I answer your question with another question. How long is a piece of rope? It depends...
okay you want to get use of scavenging in your exhaust system, primarly the header by a low pressure area created in the exhaust system that can be used to "draw" the exhaust out the chamber. I know how to explain how reversion works on a piston engine but I'd have to look into it further for a rotary. BUT if you reduce reversion you increase volumetric effeciency and power so you basicaly build your header for RPM range.
now you want low power? then you need to utilize equal length tubing with a maximum variation of +/- .5" the bends (as long as they aren't crush bent or 90 degree bends) won't affect the flow, the length and tubing size will. By going from a 2.5" (outer diameter) primary pipe to a 2.0" (outer diameter) primary pipe you increase the exhaust velocity speed providing more low end power since you want the smaller tubing to maintain a high enough velocity when there is less exhaust volume at lower RPMS.
have you considered thermal coatings or wraps? With thermal coatings you can use those to retain heat in the exhaust system since as the gases cool they loose velocity, velocity increases scavenging at high speeds and reduces reversion (reverse flow at low RPM) and not to mention reduce underhood temp so you can get cooler air into your intake for MORE POWA! Thermal wraps do a better job but I wouldn't recommend them for a street vehicle since they tend to retain moisture and will rot your pipes alot faster.
smaller pipes better low-mid range power, so basically from going to a larger pipe to a smaller pipe you move your power curve more over to the left hand side of the graph (X axis is RPM, Y axis is exh velocity or power) steeper slope.
you generally want to keep around 240-260 feet per second when an engine is operating at peak torque.
to calculate the pipe size you need there is a formula
1. desired RPM at which max tq is to be produced
2. multiply CID of one cylinder (or rotor)
3. divide by 88200
the result is cross sectional area of the pipe required
4. now divide that by 3.1412
5. take the square root
6. multiply by 2
the result is the necessary inside pipe diameter.
by changing the pipe size you shift the torque curve around by going from a larger pipe to a smaller pipe your causing the engine to take away torque from one RPM and add it to another.
increasw the length, adds tq below to engines tq peak, and vice versa.
the lower RPM range the header is required to work the longer the pipes need to be.
you can also use a collector to produce more tq below the peak but will decrease tq after the torque peak, typically you want your collector to be 3/4" bigger than your primary pipe diameter.
hope this helps!
You can build a flow bench for pretty cheap and there are instructions online.
farberio
11-30-2008, 08:28 PM
Racing beat. Nuff said.
Racing beat is ok...for a stock car...
I would not call it a great header or the end all be all header. However, it is cheap and readily available which makes it a popular choice.
Flooder
11-30-2008, 10:12 PM
Most people who buy the header are putting it on stock cars/daily drivers. If anyone builds a serious track car, where every horse power matters, it's usually a turbo setup.
farberio
11-30-2008, 11:13 PM
Which by no means makes it a good header, only a good choice for most people.
Max777
12-01-2008, 12:54 AM
Most people who buy the header are putting it on stock cars/daily drivers. If anyone builds a serious track car, where every horse power matters, it's usually a turbo setup.
Unless they run in the ITS class, for which, at least as far as I recall, the turbo setup is illegal?
correct me if I'm wrong please.
EDIT: At least I remember reading about some class for Second Gen RX-7's that stated the engine has to be N/A and ecu only has limited tuning done to it....
farberio
12-01-2008, 07:22 AM
I am not familiar with all of the rules, but I do know that AWR's header is designed specifically for ITS class.
TehMonkay
12-01-2008, 12:04 PM
ecu must stay in the same case, which is why the rtek is used
Ports and intake manifold must stay the same.
It's all in the exhaust and tuning.
Flooder
12-01-2008, 12:13 PM
I wasn't talking about auto cross. Auto cross has stupid rules and very little track time :lol:.
TehMonkay
12-01-2008, 12:14 PM
ITS is a road racing class
JunpoweR
12-08-2008, 06:18 PM
For the money, Racing Beat RoadRace full exhaust.
It is a heavy unit tho, you can get some custom made with Titanium and with every custom build exhaust I recommend flex pipe built into the system esp for turbo's to avoid problems later like cracked hot side of turbo and helps the exhaust from getting leaks at the gaskets.
ISC makes a header that the ITS guys swear by.
There are many more NA Road track cars than there are turbo's, for the simple fact that the RX-7's are classed very competitively in those classes then only allow limited modifications.
TehMonkay
12-10-2008, 02:55 PM
A collected header is best for a rotary engine.
I was planning on using the ISC headers when i go peripheral port, ii'm glad people hear good things about them.
Whizbang
12-10-2008, 02:57 PM
As far as something for a stock port engine goes that doesn't cost 500 or more, is there many choices? I am half tempted to just make my own. I have a welder, might as well use it.
drewski86
12-10-2008, 04:12 PM
The streetable Racing Beat header isn't that bad. I was making 155-160whp with a stock ~180k mile S4. You're going to find the best options from a racing team who sells their headers, but you're going to pay for their R&D. Or you could get the Racing Beat road race header and make a collector shortly after the flange, but expect to make a few before you get it "right".
Whizbang
12-10-2008, 04:14 PM
looked a little, the ISC is only 350 and is stainless which is on par with Racing beat.
drewski86
12-10-2008, 04:56 PM
From the pictures and what people have said, the ISC header is a better design as it hruns several inches from the port before the first bend. You could save ~$100 and get the non-stainless road race header from Racing Beat but it will not last as long.
I ended up going with the ISC stainless header rather than trying to save a few bucks.
Whizbang
12-10-2008, 04:58 PM
Whats your thoughts on it
drewski86
12-10-2008, 05:20 PM
Not sure yet, it's in the mail. I lost my motor so I'll have to take care of that before I'll know for sure.
There's a guy on the other forum called pirsq. He says he's got a new exhaust system, similar to the ISC, with some promising results, though none verified.
Whizbang
12-10-2008, 05:41 PM
There's a guy on the other forum called pirsq. He says he's got a new exhaust system, similar to the ISC, with some promising results, though none verified.
i've read his stuff a number of times, but seems to be a lot of hear say floating around. Ill look into it if he ever puts a chart or even a price.
He won't, he wants you to call him.
farberio
12-10-2008, 07:59 PM
Do you have the link to the ISC header? I tried google searching it but got nothing. (Or I am blind...)
N/M
Found it.
http://iscracing.net/2nd_Gen_Parts.htm
TehMonkay
12-10-2008, 09:58 PM
they used to have a seperate collector as well
they stopped making the separate collector, unless you can get 5 people interested.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.