|
Rotary Tech - General Rotary Engine related tech section.. Tech section for general Rotary Engine... This includes, building 12As, 13Bs, 20Bs, Renesis, etc... |
Welcome to Rotary Car Club. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-28-2008, 05:45 AM | #1 |
Rotary Fanatic
|
Zero Clearance Side Seals
I like to set up my side seals as tight a practical. There are different thoughts on this minimum spec.
I have seen recommendations from .002” -.004” for turbo applications. On my last engine build-up I mistakenly switched two side seals causing a .002” clearance. This resulted in scrapping the RE front plate because of a .004” wear groove on it in the area of combustion (where heat/expansion is greatest). I decided to try .000”! Found this in an early Mazda paper. What do you think? Barry |
03-28-2008, 07:37 AM | #2 |
Rotary Fanatic
|
The problem I see is the chance for the side seal to get jammed and loose compression on one face.
Dan |
03-28-2008, 11:29 AM | #5 | |
Rotary Fanatic
|
Quote:
I guess I should have said it runs gap-less. It still has clearance to expand into the added corner seal slot. Barry Last edited by Barry Bordes; 03-28-2008 at 12:22 PM.. |
|
03-28-2008, 12:59 PM | #6 |
Viable Fossil
|
Just thinking out-loud here....and I'm in the middle of only my first rebuild so go easy....
What about potential carbon build-up in that corner seal slot. I see some clearance for length, but is there risk with loss of what little "side" clearance there is within that slot due to expansion and/or carbon? What would be the result of the side seal and corner seal being effectively fused together if that happened?
__________________
Jim VR R1 FD Last edited by Signal 2; 03-28-2008 at 01:07 PM.. |
03-28-2008, 02:55 PM | #7 | |
Rotary Fanatic
|
Quote:
Barry |
|
03-29-2008, 05:31 PM | #8 |
Rotary Fan in Training
|
I'd have to go check the feeler gauges, but I'm pretty sure I clearance side seals at .0015 to .002. Nice and tight, and havent had a problem yet. Of course, we recommend a pretty long breakin period of 1500 miles before serious boosting.
|
03-31-2008, 01:58 PM | #10 |
Founder/Administrator/Internet Pitbull :)
|
Pretty neat barry! So, are you going to be ready for DGRR??
__________________
DGRR 2013 - Year of 13B www.DealsGapRotaryRally.com http://www.facebook.com/Herblenny |
03-31-2008, 11:43 PM | #12 |
The Judge
|
Those special coner seals should seal better, but where can you buy them?
If you had a good machine shop, maybe you could make them yourself. The question is, where they not cost effective for Mazda, or only used in rcae engines? |
04-01-2008, 07:24 AM | #13 | |
Rotary Fanatic
|
Quote:
I also wonder if the reason could be that the normal blow-by of the side seals might help to float the rotor between the housings. As for who makes them, I make them myself with a special diamond cutting tool. I can cut a set for you. Barry |
|
04-04-2008, 07:32 PM | #15 |
Rotary Fanatic
|
Barry,
Neat idea, but what about Apex seal clearance, assuming you had more clearance at the apex seal (two faces) you would see unwanted binding at the side seal from the apex seal rotating at the point of peak combustion pressure. Only one way to find out, and that's to test it out. If money was no object, zero clearance on everything after Nikasil coating, or something of similar low friction properties. Ceramic coating...... |