Go Back   Rotary Car Club > Tech Discussion > RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92)

RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.


Welcome to Rotary Car Club.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2017, 02:43 PM   #1
vex
RCC Loves Me Not You
 
vex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
iTrader: (6)
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19
vex will become famous soon enough
Default Ducting for Heat Exchangers

I'm working on ducting for the intercooler, oil cooler, ac condensor, and radiator and could use a quick once over/reality check. In otherwords: What are your thoughts on this ducting? I haven't put in the exhaust route for the intercooler (on the top) and the oil cooler (on the bottom). Looking for general critiques/improvements. My main concern is how I've divided the intake area to feed the different exchangers. Would it be better to divide the area vertical as opposed to horizontally?


Looking towards the ass end from the front of the ducting.


Side on (duct on top is intercooler, middle radiator and AC condensor, bottom is Oil cooler)



vex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2018, 09:38 AM   #2
vex
RCC Loves Me Not You
 
vex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
iTrader: (6)
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19
vex will become famous soon enough
Default

Update: Don't do this arrangement. The dimensions of the opening reduce the hydraulic diameter to basically nill making it insufficient for cooling. The alternative is to keep about the same area but keep the entry cross-section a much more 'balanced' square/rectangle. This keeps the hydraulic diameter and the cross-sectional area in line with the rule of thumb of about a 1/4-1/3 the size of the heat exchanger.
vex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com
Ad Management by RedTyger