Go Back   Rotary Car Club > Tech Discussion > RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92)

RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-17-2010, 01:05 AM   #13
NoDOHC
The quest for more torque
 
NoDOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Posts: 855
Rep Power: 17
NoDOHC will become famous soon enough
ReTED is right, lowering the fuel pressure hurts the atomization.

I ran for about two years with banjo bolt mod.

I was only listing the reasons that someone would install an aftermarket FPR on a NA FC.

I had no fuel pressure issues on the dyno @ 216 WHp. Bone stock 460 cc/min injectors (63% duty cycle), Stock FPR (Turbo-style), stock fuel pump.

I think that you could get about 300WHp out of the 460 cc/min injectors using peak and hold (90% Duty cycle). The stock fuel pump should be able to handle that. (This assumes an NA build, it appears that Turbo engines are hard pressed to make 200 WHp on 550 cc/min injectors). Chances are, unless you know a lot about porting, you will not make anywhere near 300WHp.

The S5 fuel rail has a much better pulsation damper than the S4 fuel rail.

The FPR is on the secondary fuel rail.
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers)
1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic)
NoDOHC is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Tags
fpd, fpr


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com