|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-25-2008, 05:33 PM | #16 | |
Reliable Source
|
Quote:
|
|
11-26-2008, 12:26 AM | #17 |
The quest for more torque
|
Colder temperature making for increased charge air density is completely true. This is why I have trouble understanding why I observed the decrease in power when i was expecting an increase in power (also substantiated by the observed power numbers with the Haltech ECU).
I am still hoping that someone on here knows the stock AFR in cold conditions. I have a wideband O2 sensor, but is is on the '86 which is getting a turbo transplant and will need the wideband. I can't use it on the '91 anyway as it is snowing in Wisconsin and I don't want to drive an RX7 in the snow if I can avoid it.
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers) 1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic) |
11-27-2008, 01:37 AM | #18 |
Rotary Fan in Training
|
it depends how you drive the car
if you accellerate agressively all the time, warming it up will save you fuel. if you drive the car gently all the time (or at least, when its cold), warming it up won't. The o2 sensor (assuming it's newish and in good order) is warm enough to be working within the first 30 seconds. It's not the issues. Fuel mapping with cold coolant IS, and if it's cold out the injectors are DUMPING fuel. I would think with the coolant at -40F, if you were to go WOT in a TII you'd run out of injector pulsewidth with stock everything well before redline. Cold engines need a TON of fuel to operate smoothly.
__________________
1992 skyline and lots of rx7's. |
11-27-2008, 04:43 PM | #19 |
Reliable Source
|
It always seemed backwards to add a bunch of fuel to a cold engine, when the fuel itself will actually cool it. But hey, whatever works I guess lol.
|
12-01-2008, 09:49 AM | #20 |
RCC Loves Me Not You
|
more air density = more fuel needed
__________________
The Official FC Radiator Thread My Project Thread: Cerberus CCVT Virginia Rotary Group |
12-16-2008, 04:07 PM | #22 |
RCC Loves Me Not You
|
Sorry it's been so long since I could post up some data. Here's a years worth of MPG data:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...H8RY-8lAK1BtZQ Preliminary data view looks like there is a slight increase in warmer weather, but nothing dramatic. Perhaps 5 miles at the most. Given that, this is through all types of driving, and is more indicative of whether I was doing city driving or freeway driving. During the summer months I was on the highway more than not, and during the winter months around town more. That alone would account for the decrease in MPG.
__________________
The Official FC Radiator Thread My Project Thread: Cerberus CCVT Virginia Rotary Group Last edited by vex; 12-16-2008 at 04:12 PM.. |
12-16-2008, 06:17 PM | #23 |
Reliable Source
|
Fill up while you can at the pump during the colder days, fuel is more dense when its colder so you get more bang for your buck since they have no way of calibrating or standardizing temperature with pricing and etc.
|
12-17-2008, 12:44 AM | #24 |
Bah!
|
Fuel at gas stations are typically stored deep underground. I don't think that area of earth is affected much by surface temperatures.
__________________
Johnson TA FC in the works! Last edited by MaczPayne; 12-17-2008 at 12:49 AM.. |
12-17-2008, 12:28 PM | #25 | |
Reliable Source
|
Quote:
And Michigan is cold always so its win win for me |
|
12-22-2008, 12:04 AM | #26 |
The quest for more torque
|
Hey, that google spreadsheets thing is pretty neat.
I guess that when I say running around town I mean my 11 mile one way commute to work on country roads. I ought to figure out how to use google spreadsheets too and post my mileage numbers I tried to summarize the data in my earlier post. The absolute worst full-tank mileage I ever got was a weekend of drag racing (1/4 mile) and an autocross = 15.1 mpg. (This does include some normal driving). I really don't know how you got 10 mpg (although the bad tps may have been part of it). I did get 12 mpg on a partial tank (filled up, went to track, ran 12 passes, went home, filled up, checked mileage).
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers) 1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic) |
01-01-2009, 12:26 AM | #28 |
The quest for more torque
|
Engine Statistics:
'86 (Stock ECU) ECU: Original N326 built in October 1985 Fuel mix: Running closed loop at 14.7:1 AFR (when it was actually closed loop) Timing: 12 degrees BTDC Leading 3 degrees ATDC trailing at idle (+17 degrees from stock) Mileage: 178,000-192,000 miles Compression: 104-110 psi on all faces Block: Never touched, never had intake or exhaust manifold off, completely stock. Coolant Seals: One may have been leaking slightly Oil Seals: Blew clouds of oil smoke above 7,000rpm OMP: Adjusted to the max Premix: 4 ounces/tank Auxiliary Ports: Functional in stock form (open at 3500 at WOT). Air pump: Functional Power Steering: Belt Removed Air Conditioning: Belt Removed Intake manifold: Stock and untouched Exhaust: Stock 3 cats (functional) Dyna-Flow Mufflers, stock Y pipe. '86 (Haltech) ECU: Haltech E6X controlling ignition and Fuel. Fuel mix: Running closed loop at 16:1 AFR (Wide band input) Timing: 0 degrees BTDC Leading 12 degrees ATDC trailing at idle (advanced until ping elsewhere, 0 degree timing split above 2,000rpm) Mileage: 192,000-199,000 miles Compression: 104-110 psi on all faces Block: Never torn down, completely stock. Coolant Seals: One leaking slightly at first, both leaking toward the end Oil Seals: Blew clouds of oil smoke above 7,000rpm OMP: Adjusted to the max Premix: 4 ounces/tank Auxiliary Ports: Modified but functional (open at 4500 at WOT). Air pump: Removed Power Steering: Removed Air Conditioning: Removed Intake manifold: UIM deburred and polished, LIM deburred Exhaust: Racing Beat Headers, Dyna-Flow Mufflers, stock Y pipe. '91 ECU: Original Fuel mix: Running closed loop at 14.7:1 AFR (when it is actually closed loop) Timing: 17 degrees BTDC Leading 2 degrees BTDC trailing at idle (+22 degrees from stock) Mileage: 146,000-154,000 miles Compression: 80-100 psi on all faces (cold) Block: in-car porting of irons to maintain runner cross-sectional area (Minimal port timing changes). Coolant Seals: Good Oil Seals: Good OMP: Not adjustable Premix: 6 ounces/tank Auxiliary Ports: Fully Functional VDI: Fully Functional Air pump: Functional Power Steering: Functional Air Conditioning: Functional Intake manifold: Port matched LIM and UIM Exhaust: Racing Beat headers, ???(Stainless steel, unknown manufacturer) presilencer Y-pipe and mufflers. I would guess that your street ported engine will not get stock port mileage. (Although I have heard some say that a street port makes little to no difference).
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers) 1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic) Last edited by NoDOHC; 01-01-2009 at 12:30 AM.. |