|
|||||||
| RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member/Lounge Rat
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Corbin, KY
Posts: 296
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
A guy with a Chevy Beretta 2.8 made a remote mount and saw a dyno proven 68hp increase.
Saying they are not effective is a false statement. They run around 6psi tops, and with a rotary putting out as much exhaust force as they do, seems like it would be more than capable of boosting to 6psi and giving NA guys a little more umph. But the car would be loud as hell |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
RCC Loves Me Not You
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Quote:
The effectiveness of a remote mount turbo sucks. There's no way around it. You will see more gains, and better performance all around the closer you put it to the manifold. Just because I said it wasn't effective does not mean it wouldn't work. It's just not very good at what it does. Quote:
. Look the turbo works off of pressure differential NOT exhaust velocity (I'd be interested on how you know how much Force our exhaust puts out). The pressure differential for the turbo comes heavily based off of Temperature. The farther away you put the turbo from the exhaust ports on the engine the less of a differential you have. This means more spool time is required to make a specific amount of boost.Bottom line is this: Will it work? Yes. Is it worth the time and money and head ache for it? No.
__________________
The Official FC Radiator Thread My Project Thread: Cerberus CCVT Virginia Rotary Group |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|