Turbo on RX-8

[05rex8]

I love my turbocharged 8. To all you haters:




Seriously though, the rx8 is not an rx7. I wish people would stop comparing the 2. The 8 is what it is. You CAN turbocharge or supercharge it safely. It's well documented at 8 club and mazdamaniac covered it in this very thread already.

And wow does it turn it into a completely different car. You don't even need gobs of boost either. Keep it at low boost and it will put a smile on your face every time you drive it. When it comes down to it, dyno numbers mean nothing. It's how the car feels to you. That's what matters. But I guess if you would rather brag on internet forums how much of a dyno queen your car is, I guess the rx8 is not a good choice.

[reddozen]

Originally Posted by Nutsid

Oh, I agree with the weight by today's standards entirely. I actually think that a base model is really light all things considered. I'm simply stating my personal preference. I could do without my electric seat, my sunroof, my heated seats. The R3 package, for example, sounds perfect to me. Well, at least as close to perfect as you can get in a modern day car. I'm sure I'd still be longing for more weight loss, but I can understand entirely that modern day regulations prohibit the days of the FB.

And the reasoning the Renesis can't make the power older rotaries can is because of the ports. Older rotaries (ie - 13B-RE and 13B-REW) utilized large intake ports. The Renesis, albeit large, is also sacrificing port size due to its six port design (at least in the manual version), and therefore you can't have the ports as large. If you made a solid opening for the intake ports in a Renesis, however, you'd sacrifice your low end torque, and let's face it, it isn't a grand amount down there.

The six port design for a rotary only works excellent as a means to stay naturally aspirated. Four ports are what you want for a turbo application. Having said that, I am really curious as to what would happen if you ported a four port to have the same closing timing as a six port, and turbocharged it using lower compression rotors. If I had way too much money I'd test that out. If you'd notice, though, all the turbocharged rotaries that Mazda has ever produced have been four ports. Good reason for that.

I'm actually having mine bridge ported currently. While I can agree with some of your statements, I think a lot of people are underestimating the Renesis. Chris is getting 500HP with his setup, yes, but he's not currently using the 5th or 6th ports, and he's only boosting to 15~16lbs of boost. Once he's popping the aux ports and running a higher boost, there's no telling just what kind of power he'll be putting down. He wants to run 19~20lbs.

They'll trying porting a 4 port eventually, but I don't think the ports are all that bigger than the ones in the 6 port in regards to the Renesis. Regardless, it'll be hard to tell which is better till more people are playing with them.

I was going to do an engine swap in the 8 till I got to talking to Brian Cain about it, and we both kind of agree that there's a lot of untapped potential in the Renesis block. Even with a bridge port, I'll have a lot less overlap than a stock 13b. Bigger port and more well behaved motor. Just my thoughts really, but we'll see once everything's in and running.

Chibana,
The exhaust port isn't the weak link. It's the upper intake manifold. This starts to get choked for air between 450~500 HP.

[rotaryextreme]

Yo...

Whats up Reddozen,

Everybody, lets think about it.

The Renesis makes almost 100 more hp then the last n/a rotary they put out.

I am sure the surface is just being scratched with the porting.

And this motor is a very reliable platform.

I am excited not just because there is a 16x comming out, I am excited how the 16x will respond to all the same modifications. And soon I'm sure somebody will have the cashflow to make a 3 rotor 2.4 from a 16x...yum.