Go Back   Rotary Car Club > Tech Discussion > Rotary Tech - General Rotary Engine related tech section..

Rotary Tech - General Rotary Engine related tech section.. Tech section for general Rotary Engine... This includes, building 12As, 13Bs, 20Bs, Renesis, etc...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-08-2012, 09:36 PM   #16
Raksj04
I have Ultra power in me.
 
Raksj04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
iTrader: (2)
Posts: 457
Rep Power: 14
Raksj04 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazdabater View Post
Lol I have a mint condition set of twins sitting in my shed that I can't get rid of.
how much are you asking for them?






Raksj04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 02:25 AM   #17
Mazdabater
FC3S
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Townsville, QLD, AUS
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 326
Rep Power: 15
Mazdabater is on a distinguished road
Default

Was chasing $100. Probs not worth the shipping to the states though.
Mazdabater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 06:57 PM   #18
88turboii
destroy, rebuild, repeat
 
88turboii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 395
Rep Power: 17
88turboii is on a distinguished road
Default

im late to the discussion , but i belive another factor that needs to be considered is manifold piping diameter and overall volume. i compared an ERC manifold with larger diameter and longer length piping against a factory S5 manifold, same turbo (with factory housing bored out for a p-trim). The ERC manfold with .84 housing spooled 1000 rpms later and was laggier all around. I did not compare peak power though

The S5 manifold's runners are about 1.3" equivalent ID at its narrowist area (oval shape). The ERC manifold runners were 1.75" ID, longer runs, and a lot more volume



The thing is, if you measure the exhaust port in the housing, it is only about 1.3" area, matching the area of the narrowest part of a factory S5 manifold. i have trouble understanding why you would go with larger ID manifold piping, if the port is the bottleneck (assuming stock ports). though most manifold builders use 1.6" ID or 1.9" ID instead

ive heard the reason it expands out at the diffuser exit is to keep egts down. i would like to try building a manifold with short 1.3" ID runners and dual wastegates to see if it could outflow the factory S5 and keep same spool characteristics

Last edited by 88turboii; 10-21-2012 at 07:05 PM..
88turboii is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com
Ad Management by RedTyger