|
Introduce yourself!! Tell me something about you and your history with rotary.. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
The Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi from mass
Hello everyone my names Sean I'm from Massachusetts and I drive a 1993 fd3s with some mods. Looking to do an na renesis swap at some point next year. Possibly a 3 rotor . Look forward to some good post as well as info thanks..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Professional Stick Poker
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Stafford, Ks.
Posts: 1,007
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Welcome. Personally I'd go with the 20B 3 rotor or stay RE/REW with a good build. Renesis would be a lot of work and money to be going backward power wise.
__________________
1988 N/A SE 2+2, dead stock and staying that way. ![]() 1979 SA22C stock? Not so much. http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_foru...ad.php?t=15585 Last edited by GySgtFrank; 11-30-2014 at 12:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
RCC Loves Me Not You
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 2,089
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Welcome!
I agree with Gunny. At least price it out before you start. I've thought recently about having to move to Renesis engines when older 13B parts start drying up, but I'm not exactly excited about it. I don't know why they couldn't make more power, but it seems that's the case. I could be wrong about all this though haha. The Cosmo 3 rotors seem like they're coming down in price as of late. It would still be an expensive swap, but at least you wouldn't be reinventing the wheel and there is already some support out there. Just out of curiosity, what are your reasons for wanting to go Renesis 3 rotor? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
sorry I meant renesis or three rotor my mistake... my motor is getting tired 105psi front 100 rear and renesis are fairly cheap and I want na for reliability aspect plus I really like na and plan on doing a time attack car. na 20b would be awesome as well but so $$$$. I had a Honda time attack car that I never got to run
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Professional Stick Poker
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Stafford, Ks.
Posts: 1,007
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
For a heavier car like the FD a single turbo, low compression ratio engine (running moderate boost) is probably going to be the most reliable rotary you can build. At least one that makes the kind of power you will need for the FD. Just don't make the common mistake that most others do and start putting together all the sexy go fast stuff on the engine and not do a massive upgrade on the fuel system and ECU. Without those any boosted rotary is likely to implode, no matter how good the engine build was.
__________________
1988 N/A SE 2+2, dead stock and staying that way. ![]() 1979 SA22C stock? Not so much. http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_foru...ad.php?t=15585 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Sean B. 1993 FD3S Touring |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
⊙⊙
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Great Falls
Posts: 1,258
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Get in contact with RICERACING for the PFC
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|