|
Phil, in the begining I tried to get the point across that we are increasing the clearence that mazda already designed for stock outout...
I am far from arrogant becuase I did not want to go into a large discussion on how we do it ...I also did not want to post some elses explanation once you did it for me I felt it would not hurt to elaborate.
I have a track record that proves what I do works and I am going to live by that becuase it is tested. I do understand your point and i wish I would have handled it different , I kinda stay back usually due to the fact that this is one of the things I am not good at (discussing our techniques with out giving to much away).
I have had some really bad expirences when it comes to trying to discuss what we do. I have spent countless hours testing and studing rotary engines. I feel like I have earned my knowlage and it is very important to me.
Now to get to the issue at had, I would think if it is even a remote possiblity of having issues with clearence any builder would take precuasions to make sure it was no longer a risk even if it is a small risk. I would be arrongant if I said well i dont think it will happen therefore its not going to. Like for instance the rotors going from side to side under load, if it is even the slitest of possiblities would it not be a disservice to your customer not to atleast regonize that its possible and try and account for it????
My point is this, even the slitest chance of the rotors needing clearcence would it not be better to have the clearnce?? When you look at the over all cost of an engine the cost of clearncing is negligable. I am not arrogant in fact the only reason I am on here is to help the communitee infact that is why we do what we do. Tom and I as the owners of AZRR started this becuase we are selves could not find a builder that would fit our needs we both are rotor heads first
|