View Single Post
Old 05-03-2009, 07:49 AM   #7
NoDOHC
The quest for more torque
 
NoDOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Posts: 855
Rep Power: 17
NoDOHC will become famous soon enough
If you go too big with the street port, your intake manifold will become your primary restriction. If you go too small, the engine can't breathe. From what I am told, you want the intake tract on the engine to remain the same cross-sectional area throughout. If anything, the port should be slightly smaller than the intake runner.

Basically street manners are completely determined by port timing. If you extend the port downwards too much, it will not idle well. Upwards hurts your starting and low-end torque.

The minimal street port that I have on my 4-port was designed to leave port timing completely stock, but to close the port more abruptly (better dynamic tuning) and allow for additional cross-sectional area to support my 1.42" primary and 1.68" secondary intake runners.

It idles rock-solid and does not stall at launch (110 Wlb-ft at 1000 rpm by g-tech). It really doesn't start to pull until 3500 (pulls the tires loose) and it comes alive at 5500 (weeee).

I will post power numbers when I get a chance to go to the dyno.
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers)
1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic)
NoDOHC is offline   Reply With Quote