1) Fendamonkey is right: thread resurrections are frowned upon, especially when nothing new and helpful was offered.
You might think this reply is antagonistic, but these types of replies are trying to steer you in the right direction.
If you're going to keep ignoring these hints, see below...
2) The original poster (OP) posted this one thread and has never logged back on...since posting this thread...in 2011.
Respect the OP's thread and leave it alone.
No one really addressed the question about the flywheel part EXCEPT ME, so I can consider all the other replies as "fluff."
You're welcome to send a PM directly to the OP, but don't hold your breath for a response.
I have been on certain online forums where thread resurrections (anywhere from 6 months to a year) can be considered a disciplinary infraction of the rules.
A better approach is to START A NEW THREAD and then REFERENCE BACK TO THE OLD THREAD WITH A LINK, if you really insist you need to do this.
3) Mr. rotar bones, you're already threading on thin ice.
We can turn around and lecture you about YOU sending your particular reply through PM as a more appropriate means and not dirtying this thread.
The above reply does not constitute anything new or helpful to the original thread.
AGAIN, I REMIND YOU THIS IS A TECH SUBSECTION.
You might think you're safe by not blatantly break any obvious rules, but keep this negative attitude up with this type of unnecessary replies in public, and you will be banned very quickly.
AGAIN, I REMIND YOU THAT YOU ARE BEING MONITORED VERY CLOSELY AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
Since we're on that note...
Unless someone has a good reason to keep this thread open, I'm closing it.
-Ted
|