[Judge Ito]

Originally Posted by TitaniumTT

Thank you Ted.

There are 2 threads on this ENTIRE site like this.

Personally, I would prefer it if Peter would debunk what hc and bdc are doing by posting his own findings. It's evident that his car can be construed as rolling proof.

We're not going to start censoring people's opinions, we will censor the words and we've been in contact with Peter about his language.

As I said, I would rather this be kept technical, and if the name calling and such continues, the thread will be continued to be cleaned up, and if repeated offenses take place, then we will take more drastic measures such as thread lockings or more than likely deletions and bans.

However, every time in the past that I had debunked or proven those two either wrong or incompetent, my posts were deleted. This does nothing to help the community by censoring my technical knowledge and experience and all it does is offer a biased one sided view. I know of a few people that have gone the bdc route and ended up with cracked plates, sheared apex seals, dropped corner seals whatever. I would rather that not happen on my watch so I will let the other side of the coin speak, as long as it can be done in a mature way. We are on the border in some of the posts though.

Like I said (hint hint) I would rather the posts be more technical in nature explaining why they shouldn't be mimiced rather than, "f*ck those bloody c*nts, they don't know what the f*ck they're talking about." I agree with Ito, that really does noone any good.

yes.. that is all im asking for. keep it technical and clean. this way, we could all learn and not turn this great site up side down. i have tons of valuable information. but i refuse to post it. y? cause i want to see how this site will take it's course. i'm sure many other members feel the same way. by no means i'm not saying peter is a donkey. we just don't need the bullshit from his mouth.