View Single Post
Old 08-10-2010, 09:24 PM   #8
NoDOHC
The quest for more torque
 
NoDOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Posts: 855
Rep Power: 17
NoDOHC will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by vex
Fix some of your issues with your math
The math is correct as far as I can tell. I used an intermediate density of 0.72g/mL because gasoline covers a broad range of densities. Perhaps you don't like that I used engineering units. (I really didn't want to put 0.0001656 L/rev).

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReTed
You might be right about a steady state snap shot of the engine, but when most people describe "BSFC" for a particular engine, we're talking about the average BSFC for all ranges.

I've heard 0.60 - 0.65 used in most applications when talking about a 13B.
Actually BSFC is typically expressed as a chart with engine load on one axis, speed on the other axis and BSFC indicated by islands (similar to a compressor isentropic efficiency map for a turbo).

Many engines are rated at peak BSFC which is commonly computed at the highest BMEP (highest torque output). This is the point that I picked.

I will develop a full load BMEP curve for my engine at a variety of speeds, but not tonight. I don't have partial load data.

I agree that you have heard those numbers, so have I, but I also heard that I should never exceed 26 degrees of ignition advance and to always run rich of 12:1 AFR. If you do that, you will have a BSFC of 0.6 lb/HPh
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers)
1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic)
NoDOHC is offline   Reply With Quote