![]() |
First project shows up tomorrow - and it's a boat :rofl: Once that's done, time depending, the trailer gets done, then we'll see. I'd like to get my FC stripped and put back together before the end of the year so if something comes up, she's already ready for DGRR. I'm hoping for an FB resto to be here around 1/1 and if it's not, I'll prob get crackin on my FD (assuming I get it) and then back to the stoppage of the FC in early March.
|
Quote:
Intake port timing has been changed to close a little later than stock. Intake manifold has been port matched, but not blueprinted. Non-polished rotors do not significantly impede flow past TDC cusp in the rotor housing. If your manifold were Blueprinted (constant cross-sectional area through entire intake runner) I think you could look 260 WHp in the face. If you didn't change stock port timing, I think you could get 285 WHp. Believe it or not, (it seems impossible to convince turbo guys of this) 0.91L will not hurt your engine NA. 1.1L will not hurt your engine NA. You will not burn a hole in a rotor (your rotors are oil-cooled) and detonation is not a problem when you are naturally aspirated. Ignition timing is not a problem either, run whatever give peak power (34 BTDC may be better for you with 9.0:1 CR and un-polished rotors). If it makes you feel better, run 0.86L (this will give almost identical power to 0.91, these are the edges of the peak power range). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have a very limited budget for this car, most of my parts were either obtained out of the scrap hopper at work, given to me by friends or custom fabricated by your's truly. I try not to spend much money on this hobby. Quote:
The only way to make a P-Port swallow more air than a streetport is to make the intake port larger than the combined total of both intake ports on the street port and to make the exhaust backpressure absolutely minimal, while maximizing the intake pressure. High-overlap engines tend to be more finicky and make less average power than equivalently built lower-overlap engines. Building them is not really that easy. (For example, I have a combined cross-sectional area of intake ports/runners of 3.2 in2, this would be a very large P-port, slightly over 2-inch diameter). I am intending more like a 1.7-2.0 in2 port cross-section for the p-port. I want to try for max power on a later p-port, but this one will have stock internals and I will not rev it past 9,000 rpm (eliminating the need for big ports). Piston engine guys need large overlap times to scavenge the chambers and to get air through their restrictive intake valves and runners. Rotaries don't have any of those problems with > 270 degrees of eccentric shaft rotation per intake stroke from a street port or 320 from a p-port (duration is not that much better on the P-Port) The VE (empirical, based on fuel and AFR, probably reads 3-5% high due to injector energization delay) on my 4-port breaks 100% @ 4800 rpm, peaks at 108% @ 7700 rpm and drops to 102% @ 9,000 rpm. At tuned resonance, a P-port could achieve ~125% VE (due to overlap), but could not hold that for a broad torque curve. Peaky power bands do no good for performance, area under the Horsepower curve is your friend. I really should be posting this in the general Rotary tech section, but most of it is already there. |
Quote:
Intake timing is slightly later on closing, intake mani port-matched but not blueprinted..... thought about going the extrude hone route but decided to save that expense for two reasons, 1-see if there actually is a difference worth the $600 or more cost 2-didn't want to spend the coin of I didn't need to in order to hit my goal Quote:
Quote:
I like to open the exhaust up for an earlier opening but not change the closing at all. That's what I did with this RE engine and it seems to work pretty well. EGT's are just fine with this. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Didn't someone make 217 Dynojet WHp using an RE on the 'evil forum'
I was pretty sure that the RE was the best flowing manifold (when stock). Polishing runners decreases the boundary layer thickness in the runner, which effectively increases the cross-sectional area. I have seen visualizations (dust in air, etc.) with a significant boundary layer of 0.25 inches. This decreases the equivalent diameter to 1/2 inch less. My stock Primaries were 1.1" minimum effective diameter, based on the surface finish they would have a 0.17 - 0.2 " boundary layer, giving a dynamic effective diameter of around 0.75" My stock Secondaries were 1.375 minimum effective diameter, giving me about 1.0" dynamic effective diameter. This means that I had a dynamic cross-sectional area of about 1.25 in2 With a 400 grit polished surface, I have a 0.03" Boundary layer (using simplifications of eddy generation) This means that my 1.3" effective diameter Primaries have a 1.24" dynamic effective diameter, while my 1.63" Secondaries have a 1.57" effective diameter. This gives a dynamic cross-sectional area of 3.14 in2. Matching these to 2.95 in2 dynamic cross-sectional area (combined) intake ports (80 grit polished) gives a near-optimal combination (slight increase in velocity after fuel mixing). Ports that are too big are actually worse for NA power than slightly small ones (loss of velocity will cause poor fuel mixture, causing uneven charge distribution, uneven and incomplete combustion. Some rough on the inside of each bend is good. (Maximizing turbulence on the inside actually improves air distribution in the runner). My LIM is not balanced, nor are the runner lengths any where near optimal (3300 rpm Helmholtz, 18,000 Sonic). Which is why I want to build a 9" runner intake for my engine. Quote:
DISCLAIMER: Actual numbers for my engine have been obtained using careful measurement of the cross-sectional area of the intake runners on my manifold. All other numbers are a result of my interpretations of complex formulas, personal experience with 4 and 2 stroke piston engines, advice/suggestions from competant friends and research into this field (SAE papers, books, etc.). I am not sure that any of the knowledge applies to rotary engines, which is why I have undergone this process, to determine if it does. So far these NA piston engine rules of thumb have been validated: Peak power at 0.9L = 13.3:1 Peak torque at 38 degrees BTDC Torque is function of VE (up to 6,000 rpm, anyway). NA piston engine Rules of thumb yet to be validated: If Torque is not linear function of VE, ignition timing or intensity is suspect Around 9.0:1 CR, torque increases about 8% per full CR increase (8.5:1 - 9.5:1). My personal theory about Port overlap being unnecessary on a rotary engine as 270 degrees of duration is possible without it is yet to be validated. SECOND DISCLAIMER: Please don't misunderstand my continued abuse on late intake port closing. For a turbo application, it is ideal, as it allows additional boost while maintaining equivalent peak compression pressures. I don't offer much advise to turbo engine builders, as I have very little experience with turbo cars, Snowmobiles, Small block and big block Chevy, Small block Ford, Small block Chrysler, Type 1 - 4 Volkswagen beetle, etc. is where I have experience. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Update -
Bought a Supra TT pump today and it's slated to arrive on Thursday. Hopefully the final playdate with Dave is set. Like I said back in June, we're gonna get this thing all set and ready to rock and roll and I'm gonna pull her apart for the winter. Oh, last update - I've joined the ranks of the legally insane - I bought an FD roller :rofl::driving::rofl: Picking her up sometime around the start of December after I get one boat gone, my boat winterized, and a lean-to built out of shrink wrap to keep her in for the winter. What in the hell am I thinking? Oh wait, I know :driving: So here's a question for the people following this thread......... I've got a bunch of things that I plan to do over the winter to the FC. The first trip will be to DGRRX. So, do I continue with this thread and re-name it, or do I start a new one titled - I hope I make it to DGRRX beginning when I pull her apart to tackle my ever expanding To-Do list? |
Quote:
You can download the driving cycle they will run and go to Dave's and tune the map to run in the Stoic range throughout that cycle (and get some NA power numbers too). |
New thread - I have to change my title too, I'm on year 7 now, lol.....
Oh, and I hate you and your FD buying SOB ass :) I expect nothing but perfection with that build as well! |
Damn, an FD as well? It's a vicious cycle now!
|
Quote:
First order of business is going to be building a centersection with the Magnaflow cat I have, then it's off to a local dyno with the CT emmisions machine so we can do a little tuning in an attempt to get her to pass. If she don't, airpump and "exhaust leak" time :D Meh, I really don't care honeslty, as long as I get my new stickers, CT can go eff itself. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
New pump arrived yesterday. Orders of business today and tomorrow are to install that, build an in-car camera mount and dyno and race this weekend. Should have, praying to have, the dyno sheets with CLEAN runs up and a few vids up as well by Sunday night. Should be the last great car weekend untill DGRRX.... that's a little depressing actually. Curse this snow!
|
Quote:
|
That slick white shit that puts my 400+hp rear wheel drive car into hibernation for 4-5 months out of the year.
Last Feb/March I actually had to TOW the 7 out of my driveway even though it had SNOW tires on her :banghead: We already had our first snow about a month ago, didn't amount to anything but it was flying |
Quote:
I can wait to see the FD Brian. Make it blue :) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted by www.GotPlacement.com