PDA

View Full Version : 1994 RX-7: Xcessive LIM & Fuel Rail install (in progress)


scotty305
11-30-2008, 02:25 PM
Finally finished installing an Xcessive Manufacturing Lower Intake Manifold (formerly marketed under the "Ground Zero" badge) , Xcessive 4-injector fuel rail, 4x 1000cc Yawpower/Injector Dynamics injectors, and a few supporting mods on my otherwise stock engine. The install took longer than expected, this thread was originally created as a checklist of what still needed to be done.


History:
Bought the car in January 2004, it was bone stock with 45,000 miles. It has seen a couple years of occasional autocrossing, some daily-driving when my other car was down, quite a few trips up and down the local mountain roads. It's now at 87,000 miles and the coolant seals are on their way out. I've had an AEM EMS and wideband installed for a little over a year now, managed to learn a bit about EFI tuning without hurting the motor so that's been fun. Before I tear the engine apart for a rebuild, I've decided to upgrade my manifold and fuel system; I'd prefer to test new things on the old motor in case anything goes wrong. As of now the car has been down for a few months and I'm hoping to have it back on the road before January (edit: finished in August!).

This project was largely inspired by Dan Chadwick's build:
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/showthread.php?t=243


Parts Sources:
Xcessive Manufacturing - LIM & Fuel Rail www.xcessivemanufacturing.com
Yawpower Injectors www.yawpower.com , purchased from local vendor www.apexspeedtech.com
AEM - Honda-style Fuel Pressure Regulator www.aempower.com , purchased from local vendor/tuner MP Tuning www.MPtuning.net
misc. metric bolts, vacuum plugs, clamps - King Bolt located on Grand Ave in Covina, CA (no website)


"Done" List (complete):
Remove UIM, rats nest, OEM fuel rails, twin turbo assembly
Fabricate & install blockoff plates for UIM: AWS
Remove coolant lines to throttle body, fast idle warmup cam
Modify OEM turbos: hammer heat shield closer to turbos for increased clearance
Modify OEM turbos: bend coolant return line (photo below shows coolant line before bending)
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3525&d=1228075863

Modify LIM: remove material from rear runner to allow clearance for secondary turbocharger
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3524&d=1228075747


Modify LIM: remove material from front-upper mounting point to allow clearance for turbo oil feed pipe (note the new angle of the turbo coolant line)
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3527&d=1228076330


Modify OEM UIM bracket (supports front of UIM near throttle body). The OEM LIM is angled toward the rear of the engine bay, while the runners on the XS LIM go straight up. This moves the UIM forward by about an inch. Among other things, the bracket pictured below needs to be modified. You can see that the notch no longer lines up with the mounting point on the UIM.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3526&d=1228076319

After taking the photo above, I made a vertical mark (using a Sharpie) where the bracket should be bent to meet the UIM. This bracket is part of the solenoid rack, which I disassembled. I clamped the bracket in a vise and used the vise to straighten out the top bend. Then I used a bending brake to bend the bracket at the mark that I had made. The mounting notch needs to be extended down; straightening the bracket and changing the bend location makes it a bit taller. Modified bracket shown below:
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3654&stc=1&d=1229058875




Test fit LIM & fuel rail

Modify OEM solenoid rack (remove all hard lines). Removing the rats nest of hard lines was easier than I thought, all you need to do is remove those awful phillips screws. PB Blaster helps, although I had to slot some of the screws and remove them with a big flathead driver.


Add FPR flange to Xcessive Fuel Rail
I built a couple of mockup brackets to mount the a universal-style Fuel Pressure Regulator with AN inlet and outlet ports, but after purchasing some AN fittings it became apparent my original idea wasn't going to work due to the size and packaging constraints introduced by the fittings. In the end, I switched to an AEM adjustable FPR that uses a flange and an o-ring and is designed mount directly to an OEM Honda fuel rail. After taking a close look at a Honda fuel rail, it's just a flat flange with a hole for the fuel and two threaded holes for mounting screws. Luckily I have a co-worker who can weld aluminum so I fabricated a simple flange and had it welded to the XS fuel rail. Doing this eliminated quite a few potential leaks: my original plan used six fittings and a short section of AN-6 fuel line to accomplish the same task. Be careful if you attempt this... the XS fuel rail mounts are not symmetrical and I put the mounting flange on the wrong side of the fuel rail on my first attempt (luckily it was only tacked on for the test-fit, see photo in post below).
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=4435&d=1235625424

The XS fuel rail originally included a metric threaded bung for installing the OEM fuel temp sensor. I opted to cut this off and tap the remaining hole for a 1/8" NPT fuel pressure sensor. Luckily the hole was already the correct diameter.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=4507&stc=1&d=1236050224



Heat and bend OEM oil filler neck:
Used a heat gun to warm the plastic until pliable, then installed the UIM and throttle body while holding the filler neck forward. Stuffed an old t-shirt between them to create a reasonable gap, then allowed the setup to cool. Repeated this process a few times until the gap was satisfactory. Bent the plastic nipple for the PCV valve forward using a hex key when it was warm.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5174&d=1240203511



Modify OEM y-pipe:
The front runner on the new LIM interferes with the location of the factory Y-pipe. Chadwick rotated his primary turbo compressor housing, tilting the y-pipe away from the LIM for more clearance. I've never rotated a compressor housing and was afraid to damage my stock twins in the learning process. Instead I trimmed some material from the y-pipe, changing the angle of the mounting flange and removing a little bit of the lip near where the rubber coupler mounts. I also switched to a thinner rubber coupler to allow for a little more clearance (the old coupler was hard as plastic, I doubt it was making a good seal).
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=4612&stc=1&d=1236574095


Bend or replace OEM hard pipes that mount to primary turbocharger:
Since the turbo oil and coolant lines needed to be bent, the OEM hard pipes for the turbo control, wastegate control, and prespool needed to be bent a little to clear them. They also needed to be bent to clear the fittings on the front of the XS fuel rail.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5173&d=1240203414



Got started on the solenoid locations and vacuum line routing. I'm not going to re-use any of the original "rats nest" hard lines since most of them would be unused or blocked off; purchased some high-temp plastic tee's from McMaster-Carr. I also built a couple of brackets to mount the wastegate and prespool solenoids on the solenoid rack (the XS fuel rail interferes with mounting them in the OEM location).
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5171&d=1240202324




Install new wires for injectors, add fuel pressure sensor, re-wrap most of engine harness:
Turns out the injectors use a separate power wire that isn't shared with anything else in the harness so this was easier than I thought. The white wire going to the blue connector (top-right of photo) is the wire used for the injector power, the pin is the same one that is used for the injector pins on the ECU connector. While the harness was out of the car I removed a few unused connectors and added a connector for the fuel pressure sensor. I also moved a few wires at the ECU connector to match the changes I made to solenoid locations. For instance, I moved the Turbo Control solenoids to different locations on the solenoid rack because this made the vacuum routing easier. This required them to use different plugs than the original factory wiring harness, so I moved the wires for those plugs to different pins on the ECU connector. So now even though the Charge Relief solenoid has been moved to a different location (and now uses a different plug) it is still controlled by the same pin on the ECU.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5919&d=1248586553

Plug OEM primary injector holes:
Called Racing Beat and asked if their injector plug kit for the older 13B engines will fit the 13B-REW. The plugs needed to be cut about 1" shorter but after cutting they fit well (see photo above). I've got exact measurements if anyone is interested.


Modify Fuel Rail flange, shorten bracket height:
Previous setup leaked when tested under pressure. Fuel injectors didn't seem secure enough with the Xcessive bracket height and the Yawpower spacers.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5920&d=1248587178



"To Do" List (incomplete):
Clean up new fuel line routing & lengths (current setup works but could use clamps and brackets to further ensure the lines don't rub).
Clean up vacuum vacuum lines, permanently plug unused nipples on UIM



More photos and updates to follow... thanks for reading.

neit_jnf
11-30-2008, 02:46 PM
very interested in seeing the modifications made to make the new LIM work with the twins! thats something i want to do in the future.

Chadwick
11-30-2008, 08:44 PM
Glad my write up helped you along, looks like a nice install. Is the blue tape on the third picture marking where you need to notch for the y-pipe? Don't forget that you have to clock the turbo and adjust the rod.

Dan

scotty305
11-30-2008, 11:12 PM
Yes the blue tape is approximately where the Y-pipe is contacting the manifold. I'm hoping I can get away without notching the manifold. Another thing I've considered is fabricating a new front part of the y-pipe, "afgmoto1978" posted a couple of nice photos on rx7club a while back.

proz07
12-01-2008, 06:32 AM
i have a question i also have x-lim and rail. im wondering why your going this route running the stock twins? if its just for piece of mind for the airflow or future single being your not going to be using the primaries anymore? i would also like to hear of the off idle low rpm response difference moving the injectors up in the air stream once you get it running?

z

scotty305
12-12-2008, 12:49 AM
Good questions, proz07.
This whole project started in July when I decided I wanted to block the rear coolant line and bypass the fast idle cam on the throttle body. As I dug deeper in the engine bay I saw first-hand how many comprimises Mazda designed into the OEM lower manifold. I was not impressed with how the runners dodged the ACV and EGR passages... who knows what that does to airflow but it can't be good and I'd rather not find out the hard way. Still need to block that rear coolant line, fast idle cam is done though.

http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3657&stc=1&d=1229063776



Things sort of snowballed from there. I didn't originally plan on making any other changes but then I decided I wasn't too impressed with the OEM fuel rails and plumbing. Main reason to upgrade now is because I'm afraid that if I were to use the OEM secondary fuel rail I'd have to plug the two additional injector holes in the XS LIM and wouldn't be able to un-plug them in the future.


The primary injectors are only moving a few inches upstream, I don't anticipate major problems from moving them. I'm not saying the distance won't be noticeable, but you can adjust the injector phasing in the EMS (not just the pulsewidth but also when the injectors are opened... similar to the difference between coil dwell and ignition timing). I've heard that other people had funny idling and throttle response complaints but I suspect this may have been due to improper injector phasing... either the ECU couldn't adjust it or the tuner might not have been aware that it could make a difference. According to some people there are potential fuel economy and power gains to be had by moving the injectors further upstream due to improved atomization, unfortunately I'm making so many other changes this might be difficult to quantify. I'll definitely post the results here, even if they're bad.


I'm not sure if I'll want much more power than the stock twins are capable of, but I'm hoping this fuel system will be capable of supporting whatever I decide to do in the next few years.

neit_jnf
01-13-2009, 10:21 AM
updates?

and where will you be getting all the vaccuum/boost sources that the new mani doesn't have?

scotty305
01-17-2009, 04:40 AM
I haven't made much progress lately... past few weeks got busy at work, plus Christmas and New Years and family stuff. I purchased some AN fittings but they are larger than I realized, my fittings aren't fitting. My revised fuel setup will include an aftermarket FPR designed for a Honda setup which mounts directly to the fuel rail using a flange with an o-ring. Mounting the regulator to the fuel rail will eliminate 5 fittings and adapters compared to my original plan (NPT-to-AN male, AN-female to push-on hose, push-on hose to AN female, AN male to AN male). I'm hoping to finish that within the next week or so.


The OEM lower manifold includes four vacuum pass-throughs (near the top)... I'm removing one of those lines (EGR) and planning to route the other three (used with the Charge Control and Charge Relief valves) around the rear of the manifold near the firewall.

The vacuum line near the front secondary intake runner supplies air for the primary injectors, that passage is not retained with the XS LIM so the vacuum line will not be necessary.

The other vacuum line is just manifold pressure, the diagram isn't clear but I think it is used for the OEM fuel pressure regulator. After eliminating the AWS, ACV and EGR solenoids there will be at least one unused port on the UIM near the throttle body... one of those ports will feed vacuum/boost directly to the FPR (the OEM Fuel Pressure Control solenoid will be eliminated).

scotty305
01-27-2009, 02:58 AM
Update: purchased Honda-style FPR, mounting flange nearly completed.

Did some more research on the OEM solenoid vacuum lines, ECU pins and control logic. I've always wondered why most (but not all) of the solenoids are OFF at low RPM and ON after the secondary transition. The only exception is the Charge Control solenoid, it is controlled exactly opposite of all the others... ON at low RPM and OFF after the secondary transition. It turns out the vacuum lines for the Charge Control solenoid are plumbed backwards compared to the other solenoids... see diagram below:
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=4123&stc=1&d=1233545483





I want the ECU to operate the Charge Control Solenoid the same way the others are activated, (off then on) this will allow me to experiment with controlling the sequential switchover point based on a combination of TPS, MAP, RPM or even VSS rather than simply RPM-based control. In order to do that, the vacuum and pressure lines going to the Charge Control solenoid will need to be swapped. The plan is to install the solenoids and vacuum lines as shown below, this should leave room to mount the Prespool and Wastegate solenoids on the bottom row of the solenoid rack (the top-feed fuel rail is going to prevent them from being installed in their original location).

http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5172&stc=1&d=1240204440





Update 01-31-2009: finished mounting flange, tacked it to fuel rail for test fit. Fits the FPR well but I put it on the wrong side of the fuel rail... turns out the fuel rail mounts aren't symmetrical. Good thing it wasn't fully welded on.


http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=4115&stc=1&d=1233460079

albertomg
02-25-2009, 02:33 PM
Hmmm..... Seems like a lot of work to make work with twins. If equal distribution of air is the goal, wouldn't it potentially be easier and cheaper to send the stock LIM out to be flowed and ported?

Also, when you are grinding out material for clearancing, how do you take the expansion of the metal into account? Does it require 1mm, 2mm or whatever space to take that into account?

Thanks for the input and good luck with your project.

scotty305
02-26-2009, 01:04 AM
Yes it is definitely more work than I realized from reading Dan Chadwick's thread. I suspect I would have been finished months ago if I had decided to stick with the stock fuel system and plug the holes in the XS LIM. He mentioned that he needed to add about 20% fuel to a previously tuned map after installing the XS LIM and performing some minor port work on his most recent engine build... I'd be pretty happy if I picked up an additional 5-10% power compared to the stock LIM... that would be 10-20whp which isn't too bad.

Good point regarding thermal expansion... I'll have to ask some Mechanical Engineer friends of mine to give a ball-park estimate of how much the turbos and manifold might grow when they get hot. I suspect the answer will be less than 2mm. I had some aluminum injector spacers fabricated and the outer diameter was about 0.001" larger than the hole that they needed to slide into, and someone suggested that I freeze the spacers and heat the manifold because that might make the cold parts shrink and the warm parts expand enough for everything to fit. I was skeptical so I borrowed a set of calipers to see the results of thermal expansion. After putting the spacers in the freezer they shrinking by almost 0.001," using a heat gun to heat the manifold so hot you couldn't touch it resulted in the injector holes expanding less than 0.001" (maybe 0.0005" larger). The result still didn't fit. When I purchased my XS fuel rail I asked them what they recommended for installing top-feed injectors in their LIM. They sent four rubber spacers which are apparently OEM parts used for the injectors in the FC3S. They actually said that the injector holes in the XS LIM are slightly smaller than the OEM FD3S LIM because they wanted a tighter fit with these rubber FC3S injector spacers. The fit is great, they are the thick black spacers in the photo below, I will use them instead of the green lower o-rings that were supplied with the Yawpower injectors.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=4436&d=1235625437




I also decided I'd like to re-clock the vacuum port on the AEM FPR so it points toward one of the vacuum ports on the rear of the stock UIM. The top half of the assembly can be removed and rotated, as explained in their instructions:
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=4437&d=1235625442

neit_jnf
02-26-2009, 01:27 AM
wait, so that means stock secondary rail wont fit because the holes are smaller?

scotty305
02-26-2009, 09:57 PM
Rich from Xcessive told me the holes are slightly smaller (maybe a couple thousandths, I don't remember). It shouldn't be a big deal if you're working with rubber, and it wasn't much of a problem with aluminum either... some 1000-grit sandpaper and a couple hours of sanding on the hardwood floor while watching TV and they fit fine. By the way, I had the aluminum spacers machined by a friend and I asked him to make them slightly large, they didn't quite fit the stock manifold either but it's easier to remove some material than add more.

My main concern with the aluminum spacers was there wasn't a lot of seating area for the green o-rings... when I mentioned this to Rich from Xcessive he suggested the rubber FC3S spacers for use with top-feed injectors, apparently they're only a couple of bucks each.

The stock secondary rail should fit just fine with the XS LIM, quite a few people have done that and apparently you need to trim about 1/4" of material from either the stock fuel rail or the front runner on the XS LIM. I put one of the plastic secondary injector diffusers in the hole, it fit fine.

hwnd
03-03-2009, 12:10 AM
Scott is rich, look at his leather couch!

I've got 100% faith in ya, doing it once, doing it right.. ;-)

scotty305
03-03-2009, 02:23 AM
Haha, wish I was rich... the car would be back on the road already. Scored the couch for free when a friend upgraded to a new couch (it has some cat scratches). Need to find some tough snap ring pliers to clock the primary compressor housing... Chadwick made this stuff sound easy, that's how I know he's got some skills and experience in addition to a nice set of tools.

scotty305
04-20-2009, 12:07 AM
Getting dangerously close to being finished now... first post has been updated and the "to do" list finally feels like it is getting shorter. If I can get the blasted wiring harness through the firewall and the fuel system holds pressure without any leaks it may fire up next weekend.

Thanks to Nathan and Casey (not RCC members but good guys just the same) for stopping by and lending a hand this weekend.

speeddemon32
04-21-2009, 09:07 AM
oh man, this thread is SOOO much better when you log in. I can see the pictures!

he he . anyways, your welcome! It was fun working on a rotary car again. makes me want one again. :-(

I am looking forward to seeing your car back on the road again. you know I want a ride right?

speeddemon32
07-14-2009, 03:34 PM
soooooo????? :-)

MaczPayne
07-15-2009, 10:50 AM
Hey Casey!

scotty305
07-26-2009, 02:05 AM
Posted a couple more photos and updated first post to show what I've been up to in the past couple of months... lots of wiring, a couple of modifications to the fuel rail (one of the mounting holes in my original flange was acting as a huge leak because it was inside where the welds sealed the rail to the flange). Also ran a lot of vacuum lines the past week or two, that's nearly done now.
Have let a lot of things get in the way the past few months but it's starting to feel like the project is nearly finished.

scotty305
08-10-2009, 01:42 AM
It's alive!!!

Got it fired up this week... spent about an hour idling in the garage today... adjusting fuel pressure, burning off lots of PB Blaster that had been used to break the exhaust studs loose, adjusting idle and low RPM settings...

So far there aren't any leaks, although the drain plug from my CSF aluminum radiator stripped the first time I removed it... I burned at least a day getting the tools to drill and tap a larger hole and then trimming a very large bolt shorter so it would work as the new drain plug.

I started the new fuel map from scratch because I wanted to try a few different things, but so far so good... it idles smoothly at 800-850RPM and throttle response seems just as good as it always was now that I've got the fuel map somewhat dialed in (running 50 psi fuel pressure for now, may turn it up eventually depending on duty cycles at high RPM). Idle seems to want a slightly richer AFR (12.5-13.0 compared to about 13.0-13.5 before), but I did find a pretty major exhaust leak at the flange where the downpipe meets the catalytic converter (one of the two bolts was missing!) so it's possible that may have been skewing the readings in the past. It's much quieter at idle without the exhaust leak.

I'll post photos soon, the engine bay looks very OEM with the UIM installed... still need to reinstall the hood, undertray(s), airbox, IC and charge piping before getting back on the road.

ehron
10-08-2009, 07:01 AM
Any updates? I am interested to see how your gas mileage turned out after moving the primaries upstream. I would imagine your car likes the richer idle for the same reason.

scotty305
10-10-2009, 01:18 PM
Not sure about gas mileage yet... have only gone through one tank of gas since getting the car back on the road. It was slightly better economy than the previous few tanks but I've moved recently so the car is seeing different driving patterns than before.

I've tried to adjust injector phasing and ignition timing in an attempt to get the idle smoother with less fuel but haven't been successful yet: leaner than 12.0 and the car tends to hiccup and misfire at idle. Next on the to-do list is adjusting fuel pressure, currently set to about 50psi with the engine off.

I don't think the injectors are to blame, pulsewidths are pretty reasonable at idle (around 2.4ms) and the charts provided by Injector Dynamics show their flow is linear well below 2.0 ms. At 11.5-12.0 it will idle smoothly down to 700RPM, and throttle response seems just as good as it was before changing the setup.



Almost forgot to mention: I originally had the Turbo Control solenoid vacuum lines swapped... pressure went to the vacuum port and vacuum went to the pressure port. Needless to say the car didnt transition properly until that was fixed; boost was normal below the transition RPM but dropped quickly above it.

dudemaaan
10-10-2009, 02:10 PM
Nice work, Look forward to seeing the power difference with the new LIM.

scotty305
10-30-2009, 10:38 AM
Got on a dyno last weekend. This is the first time the car has been on a dyno so unfortunately I don't have other numbers to compare against.

AFR's were about 10.0-11.0 according to the AEM wideband in the downpipe, and about 10.5-11.5 according to the dyno's Motec wideband mounted in a pipe and stuck in the end of the muffler (after the stock cat, stock muffler).
Ignition timing was about 3-11 degrees leading advance depending on RPM, with 15 degrees trailing split. Boost was about 10psi (165-173kPa), dropping to 7psi at the transition.

Didn't spend too much time making adjustments... it was late at night and the dyno owner was doing me a favor letting me use the machine. Boost wasn't as smooth as I'd like it to be (especially on the blue squiggly run), and I suspect there may be more power at different AFRs or ignition timing.

http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6648&d=1258092255

TitaniumTT
11-29-2009, 10:49 AM
Scotty, I'm quite impressed with your build, I must say. You did a fine job with the fuel system. I was hoping to be the first one here to comment on the ID injectors. Which are you using? the ID 750, or the 1000 or a combination. I believe I'll be stuck with 4 1000's or two 750's and 2 2000's. We'll see, I still need to call Paul. Loving the FPR setup though. Very awesome.

Rotaries love the fat dumb and happy idle. It keeps the flame front slow and steady. My car loves the .85-.87 range for idle as do just about all the other rotaries that I have seen. IGN timing is around 5* @ idle. Holds really nicely for me.

Fuel pressure. I would run it as low as possible. It's my opinion that 50psi is just too high (unless Paul disagrees) however, I know a gent at MoTeC that is running his S5 @ 39psi static with 4 ID1000's. He sees 82% duty @ 15psi with .8L at redline.

Lambda's - there is alot more power, response and believe it or not, boost stability to be picked up by leaning at the fuel map. What I found with excessivly rich AFR's is the unburnt fuel increases EGT's as it burns in the manifold. This extra energy spools the turbo's harder for that split second. It's exponentially worse on a misfire.... tons of raw fuel expanding in the mani makes for unhappy turbo's, stockers anyway.

If you would like, I'd be more than happy to send you my timing map to compare with yours.

Why did you choose the AEM over the PFC. For your setup it would seem that the PFC would be the way to go (I honestly don't know anything about the AEM) or did you just want to experiment?

TitaniumTT
11-29-2009, 11:54 AM
Something else to consider RE:High rail pressures. What fuel pump are you using? I can tell you from personal experience that the Desno fuel pumps are not very effiecent at all. The are hungry for amps. The more amps, the hotter they get, the hotter the get, the less effiecent they are, to the point where rail pressure starts to fall off. I know this from personal experience. 50psi plus boost puts you into the 60psi range, mine has trouble keeping up with 56psi on repeated dyno runs. Granted I'm using more fuel than you, so more flow at the same pressure means more load on my pump, but it's something that I would be concerned about. Proper wiring is the best place to start.

scotty305
11-29-2009, 02:10 PM
Thanks, TitaniumTT.

All four injectors are ID1000's, I like them so far. One of the guys from Yawpower suggested the fuel dispersion/atomization is better at higher pressure (up to a point, of course). Stock fuel pump and wiring so far; I know it's not ideal for pump voltage but the fuel pressure sensor says that's not a problem yet. The same guy from Yawpower suggested upgrading to a Bosch fuel pump if I want to increase fuel pressure above where it's currently at.

I saw a local RX7 guy using a PFC and wasn't too impressed with the interface or capabilities. I went with AEM because I know a few locals with AEM tuning experience (mostly piston engines though); it can do quite a bit including closed-loop boost and O2 feedback, factory oil metering pump control. Outputs aren't as flexible as the Motec from what I gather, I don't think there's a way to PWM the CCV and CRV like you've mentioned in your thread. I'm using a bit of a workaround to get PWM control of the prespool valve; the EMS has a couple of tables (MAP vs RPM) intended for variable cam control and I'm using one of those.

The car isn't happy idling at 0.85 lambda (12.5 AFR), it wants to see closer to 0.80-0.82 or it will misfire. I've made most of the changes to the primary injectors that should result in a poor idle (further from intake port, higher flow rate, lack of OEM 'fuel diffuser' insert), I'm not sure I'll be able to tune it out. I've been meaning to adjust fuel pressure and see if that makes a difference, might give that a shot this week.

scotty305
02-27-2010, 09:22 PM
I recently cut up the the stock gauge cluster to install a wideband O2 gauge in place of the OEM coolant temp gauge. I first saw the idea on Max Cooper's page: http://www.maxcooper.com/rx7/how-to/spa_gauges/index.html


I removed the coolant gauge because it's been non-functional for a few years. I made a digital gauge using the coolant sensor in the rear iron for an instrumentation class. It's mounted behind a smoked plastic lens covering the warning lights on the left side of the cluster.


http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7479&stc=1&d=1267323609

http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7480&stc=1&d=1267323609

The lighting on the O2 gauge is too bright at nighttime, I may adjust this eventually. Aside from that I'm pretty pleased with how it turned out.

speeddemon32
02-28-2010, 02:19 PM
looks awesome man!

prrex4ever
03-02-2010, 07:45 PM
Nice mod with the wideband in the dash, looks good.

scotty305
07-17-2010, 01:46 AM
Update:
Car passed an emissions test.
Coolant seals finally gave up the ghost.
I'm afraid the old engine won't have many useful parts in it, but don't have the free cash to spend on a Mazda reman.
Pulled the engine out a week or two ago, this is probably the biggest car project I've taken on so far. I'm going to try my luck with a used engine from Japan.

http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=8565&stc=1&d=1279349188



Trying hard to avoid doing too many 'while you're in there' projects this time, we'll see how that goes...

right now I'm very tempted to remove the power steering rack and modify it as shown here (guys on another RX-7 forum claim that our rack is nearly identical):
http://flyinmiata.com/tech/depower.php?x=1

TitaniumTT
07-17-2010, 09:22 AM
I've got a detailed write-up in the 2nd gen section on depowering the racks, tons of pics. I used the flying miata as a guide

DO NOT just drop that used engine in. Learn from my mistake. When I got my 13B-RE I could tell it had already been rebuilt once becuase it had the TII/REW exhaust sleeves in it. It lived a short time and died a PAINFUL death becuase a few seals were carbon locked. It would've been cheaper for me to crack it open, clean everything out and replace all the seals.

Personally I would skip on buying the used engine until you crack your old one open and see what's bad. It could be about the same price to rebuild your old one that it will be buy a used/condition unknown engine and drop it in. I know of too many people that have dropped in "good condition" used engines and they don't last long at all.

Personally I think you're making an assumtion on your old engine being completety fragged.

scotty305
07-17-2010, 12:24 PM
Just read through your de-powering thread, TitaniumTT... thanks for the insight. Looks a bit beyond my comfort level but I will show the info to a few friends and see if any of them are willing to help. Very cool thread... http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/showthread.php?t=7900


The coolant seals have been leaky for at least a couple of years, and the original engine has about 88k miles on it... I'm afraid that I'll need to replace at least one rotor housing and two irons, which would bring the cost of a rebuild higher than what I want to pay at the moment.

Blurry photo, but one face of the front rotor looks pretty rusty, and there was a significant amount of water coming out of both F & R spark plug holes when the eccentric shaft pulley was turned backwards by hand. That's why I'm thinking the old engine is in pretty rough shape.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=8566&stc=1&d=1279387164


I've already purchased the used JDM engine, and the seller offered a 30-day startup warranty so I'm going to hustle to get everything together (and hopefully onto a dyno) before those 30 days are up.

My plan is to tear the original engine apart once the car is back up and running, then decide to either rebuild it without rushing to get the car back on the road (and then remove & sell the JDM engine) or sell what core parts aren't trashed. I agree that rebuilding will be the best solution, but was afraid the core wouldn't contain enough re-usable parts.


Update 2010-07-20: I'm not sure the exact year and mileage of the Japanese engine (96 or newer because it includes the 16-bit ECU harness and updated rat's nest), but the turbos look to be in good shape, not a crack to be found:

http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=8588&stc=1&d=1279683439

speeddemon32
10-20-2010, 03:04 PM
SOOOOO???? whats goin on now? I know its up and running. If I remember right all is well? correct?

scotty305
11-07-2010, 01:38 PM
Wow I haven't updated this in a while. The Japanese engine went in right around 30 days from when it was purchased, and is running pretty nicely. The car has done about 500-750 miles on the 'new' engine, went to Sevenstock and back and few other short trips. Found an oil leak that appears to be the rear main seal and/or rear stationary gear o-ring... replacement parts are on the way and I will be tackling that in the next couple weeks. At first it seemed like the leak may have been from the oil pan, but closer inspection shows oil coming from the bellhousing and seeping down toward the engine mounts & oil pan.

I'm not looking forward to removing the transmission and flywheel, but I'm lucky enough to have access to a lift so I shouldn't complain. I picked up an Exedy Stage1 clutch to replace the original, which seems to be doing OK but has nearly ~90k miles on it.

Aside from replacing an old stock engine with a less-old stock engine, the original engine mounts were replaced with aftermarket Himni polyurethane mounts; they added noticeable (annoying) vibration around 1500RPM but are smooth at idle and at cruising RPM. Throttle response is noticeably more crisp, and it seems they transmit a bit more noise from the engine and transmission into the cabin. If I had to do it again I would try to find something slightly less stiff but overall these are pretty nice.


Just for kicks, I haven't reinstalled the power steering pump yet. The PS lines are still installed but the connections are vented where they would usually attach to the pump. The feel is better than having the PS pump installed with the belt removed, but I think I prefer the feel of having power steering. I'm probably going to reinstall the pump and try to get a ride in a few cars that have been converted to manual steering before trying anything more drastic.

Per the advice of someone with lots of tuning experience, I flattened out the idle fuel cells a bit and the car is now pretty happy idling around 13.0-14.0 AFR once the engine is warm. For instance, if the car idles around 30-45kPa those cells are set to deliver the same fuel pulse. If the load increases to 50kPa because of the cooling fans turning on, or from slowly letting out the clutch to creep forward, the fuel map increases quite a bit so the resulting AFR is 12-13 or so.

mazda244
09-22-2011, 09:34 PM
looks pretty clean