View Full Version : BorgWarner S400
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 09:39 AM
Lots of torque on this monster
FC with S5 block stud
1000cc/2000cc
1/2 bridge
E85
borgwarner S400 turbo
hades
11-04-2016, 10:11 AM
Lots of torque on this monster
FC with S5 block stud
1000cc/2000cc
1/2 bridge
E85
borgwarner S400 turbo
It looks like Helen Keller was trying to draw line and failed miserably
TitaniumTT
11-04-2016, 10:18 AM
Wonder what the problem is? Ignition breakup is clear, loosing the tach signal, way to lean... running 12's with that much boost won't last long unless the dyno wasn't calibrated properly
Then again I saw your comments on the evil forum about timing and I lol'ed
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 10:28 AM
Wonder what the problem is? Ignition breakup is clear, loosing the tach signal, way to lean... running 12's with that much boost won't last long unless the dyno wasn't calibrated properly
Then again I saw your comments on the evil forum about timing and I lol'ed
Oh! My this forum is so negative, the car was slipping on the dyno and the A/f are tuned too 11.5-11.8 timing is set to 9 degrees up top and yes it was loosing tach signal, also this was tuned on E85.
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 10:30 AM
It looks like Helen Keller was trying to draw line and failed miserably
It's called loosing tach signal and slipping on the dyno :smash:
hades
11-04-2016, 10:38 AM
It's called loosing tach signal and slipping on the dyno :smash:
It's called not posting worthless info.
hades
11-04-2016, 10:40 AM
It's called loosing tach signal and slipping on the dyno :smash:
Then fucking say that when you post. And what is the plan to fix the issues.
Holy fuck man. It's not being negative - it's elavulating the half ass shit you post.
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 10:45 AM
It's called not posting worthless info.
The post was about the dyn #
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 10:53 AM
graph
Fendamonky
11-04-2016, 10:54 AM
Oh! My this forum is so negative,
You confuse negativity with being critical. You typically present piles of shit, yet expect praise.
If you only see criticism as negativity, instead of an opportunity to better your products, then we will continue to criticize what you post.
Bottom line, you lack the skills to support the ego you display.
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 11:01 AM
You confuse negativity with being critical. You typically present piles of shit, yet expect praise.
If you only see criticism as negativity, instead of an opportunity to better your products, then we will continue to criticize what you post.
Bottom line, you lack the skills to support the ego you display.
So cursing someone out isn't negative
TitaniumTT
11-04-2016, 11:17 AM
Loosing tach signal and slipping on the dyno will not drop a 1/2 point of AFR unless the load drops as well. This is why tuning with bullshit ecu's with no or lacking datalogging is such a ridiculous pain in the ass.
TitaniumTT
11-04-2016, 11:18 AM
Also not seeing anyone cursing you out. Just seeing crap getting posted and people voicing opinions.
Fendamonky
11-04-2016, 11:22 AM
So cursing someone out isn't negative
You must be a very tender, unique, delicate little blossom of kindness and hope if you think an ENGINEER using adult language to describe the trash you post up is considered "cursing someone out".
Here's a hint: It isn't. Grow a set and/or (preferably "and") go away.
hades
11-04-2016, 12:26 PM
The post was about the dyn #
I post data to High level executives.
I explain details of the graph and any parts of the graph that don't make sense.
Just posting up information is useless. It's not inspiring. It's a waste of time.
TitaniumTT
11-04-2016, 12:47 PM
But interwebz nutswingers don't know enough to look at the details, they see >600 and they pee themselves and they want it. They generally don't understand that it's more than the peak
Case and point, not to knock Levi here but I recall a 471rwhp FD that went toe to toe with my little 370-380rwhp FC. FD had the clear weight advantage as well yet in highway pulls from 50 to whenever we stopped, the cars were bumper to bumper the entire way despite the FD's 90-100rwhp advantage not to mention weight advantage. How is that possible.... lets go to the graphs... If I had them anyway it would be self explanatory yet people would rather have the high strung meth dependant FD than the FC making sub 400rwhp even though they were identical in highway pulls and the FC would be faster around a track because of the transient response and broader torque curve.
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 01:03 PM
I post data to High level executives.
I explain details of the graph and any parts of the graph that don't make sense.
Just posting up information is useless. It's not inspiring. It's a waste of fucking time.
Don't curse in my forum
TitaniumTT
11-04-2016, 01:35 PM
Don't censor on my forum ;)
You want to remove profanity, fine, don't delete valid points
hades
11-04-2016, 01:55 PM
Don't curse in my forum
Blow me.
Don't post worthless projects and worthless info on my forum
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 02:44 PM
Don't censor on my forum ;)
You want to remove profanity, fine, don't delete valid points
Your forum excuse me I'm the vendor
Pete_89T2
11-04-2016, 03:10 PM
Your forum excuse me I'm the vendor
:rofl: Do you think being a vendor gives you special privileges around here?
Vendors don't own this forum numbnuts. If anything, folks will be MORE critical and LESS TRUSTING of whatever a vendor posts here because vendors should know better. Clearly in this case, you do not.
TitaniumTT
11-04-2016, 03:48 PM
Why the urination contest? Really? I don't get it.
chibikougan
11-04-2016, 04:13 PM
dQw4w9WgXcQ
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 05:51 PM
:rofl: Do you think being a vendor gives you special privileges around here?
Vendors don't own this forum numbnuts. If anything, folks will be MORE critical and LESS TRUSTING of whatever a vendor posts here because vendors should know better. Clearly in this case, you do not.
No!I don't but was does the page say (vendon forums) Now I see why no Vendors hardly ever post in here, it's not worth it.
hades
11-04-2016, 06:21 PM
The other forum isn't giving you any praise either. Members pretty much said the same thing about your twins that we did. Paperweight.
zayrx7
11-04-2016, 09:18 PM
The other forum isn't giving you any praise either. Members pretty much said the same thing about your twins that we did. Paperweight.
That's because it's the same people from this forum, I guess you didn't see the screen names.
hades
11-05-2016, 12:45 PM
That's because it's the same people from this forum, I guess you didn't see the screen names.
lastphaseofthis-no point if non-sequential
IRP Performance -
Interesting setup and clean fab work but agreed that its not really worth it on a 2 rotor as a modern well sorted single will easily outspool and outpower twins. Also, clamping -an line is a big no no. I would change the overflow hose and whatever else yo have clamped like that. Remove the nipples out of the housings and tap for a npt to -an fitting.
So 2 people - 1 of which has his own well known shop says it's pointless.
You had one "fan" that I saw. I would venture he isn't an educated Rx7 owner
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.